it’s a fake tweet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Please tag your post as a joke, not real, or similar. If you leave it in its current state ^[2]^, you are knowingly peddling disinformation ^[1]^.

Update (2025-03-06T01:45Z): OP has modified the post's body stating that it's a fake tweet ^[3]^. Imo, the title should preface that it's fake ^[1]^.

References

  1. Type: Article. Title: "Trump post saying US president should be impeached if Dow drops 1,000 points in 2 days isn't real". Author: "Jordan Liles". Publisher: "Snopes". Published: 2023-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:37Z. URI: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-post-dow-impeachment/.
    • ¶4.

      […] Trump did not post a 2012 tweet saying the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 1,000 points in two days should result in a U.S. president's immediate impeachment. […]

  2. Type: Post (Through: App (Name: "Thunder".)). Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@spujb@lemmy.cafe". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ("!politicalmemes@lemmy.world"). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:42Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.

  3. Type: Post (Through: Website (Name: "sh.itjust.works")). Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@spujb@lemmy.cafe". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ("!politicalmemes@lemmy.world"). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:54Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    mods say im fine also i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago

    […] i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.

    What? I haven't deleted, nor reposted anything in this context. Are you sure you aren't just getting a ping because I @mentioned you in the comment's references ^[1]^?

    References

    1. Type: Comment (Through: Website. Name: "sh.itjust.works".). Author: "Kalcifer" ("@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works"). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@spujb@lemmy.cafe". Publisher: ["Political Memes" (!politicalmemes@lemmy.world). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.]. Published: 2025-03-06T01:56:28Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T02:26Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.
        • Highlighted in yellow are the mentions to @spujb@lemmy.cafe's contained within the comment's "References" spoiler.
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    i did, as soon as i had time. downvote to say thanks :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago*

    I think OP is editing this comment ^[1]^ in bad faith:

    • Current version ^[1.1]^:

    • Original version ^[1.2]^:

    References

    1. Type: Comment. Author: "@spujb@lemmy.cafe". Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@spujb@lemmy.cafe". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ("!politicalmemes@lemmy.world"). "Lemmy".]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.]. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095972.
      1. (Through: Website. Name: "sh.itjust.works".). Published: 2025-03-06T00:02:54Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T02:04Z.
      2. (Through: App. Name: "Thunder".). Published: 2025-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T00:01:03Z.
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Just a harmless observation here, but I can't help but notice that liberals spend way too much time de-bunking, but not nearly enough time bunking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Good question! I mean, I'm not suggesting that the left should create compelling, motivating, entertaining (but not necessarily "literally" true) content targeting low-information voters in an effort to swamp out fascist garbage. Nor would I imply that the time has come to use every underhanded, dirty, ratfucking trick in the book to make those voters distrust Republicans. Heaven forbid!

    But I will say outright that in my estimation the left's fastidious, timid, mousy attempts to debunk the tidal wave of fascist bullshit is not working out very well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    too much sarcasm i was being genuine. if you want to give me a real answer feel free but i literally cannot parse what you mean here :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We need more viral leftist shitposting, and less concern about getting every single fact exatly right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago

    oh okay thank you!

    yeah actually a lot of my account is focused doing exactly that :) this is reposted, but my original content i try to keep very rhetorically effective—and i also fact check it (unlike this trainwreck lol)

  • source
  • parent