you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Just like when he backed out of that fight with zuck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It should've been some kind of extreme badass death match deluxe: nobody gets out of the cage while any one of them is still breathing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I agree that "either" is more specific. And I don't mind being reminded of it.

    Otoh "any" is defined as ∃ x and every definition I found explicitely specified that cardinality is irrelevant. Either then is a subset of any, not a separate category.

    So imho this isn't a mistake and you're way more unconditional than you should.

    PS: as long that everyone remains sufficiently mutually understandable we should adopt a descriptivist attitude towards languages instead of a prescriptivist one.

    PPS: Don't get me started on language as a class marker. This is a threat. c:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments