49
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)
World News
39402 readers
649 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Giving 50% of all future profits is quite harsh but the first 50% until 750bn+ and NATO membership actually quite a good deal for both sides.
US has already explicitly ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine. It's not going to happen.
That’s because there’s no actual intention to protect Ukraine.
and there never has been
Certainly weird that Biden provided arms to Ukraine but prevented them from using them in Russian territory. It does seem like all the US has done is surrender Ukraine slowly.
There is nothing weird about the US not wanting to be directly at war with Russia actually. What's weird is that people in the west wholeheartedly supported this proxy war in which the west was cynically using Ukraine to fight Russia.
As kissinger said, its . Much more lethal to be Americas friend than its enemy.
Exactly as in 2014, ukraine can get better deal from Russia than west. The only reason west will support ukraine is to funnel weapons to support terrorism against new russia.
Deal is aweful to accept for Ukraine, and only zelensky corruption could result in it.