you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Giving 50% of all future profits is quite harsh but the first 50% until 750bn+ and NATO membership actually quite a good deal for both sides.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    US has already explicitly ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine. It's not going to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That’s because there’s no actual intention to protect Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Certainly weird that Biden provided arms to Ukraine but prevented them from using them in Russian territory. It does seem like all the US has done is surrender Ukraine slowly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 years ago

    There is nothing weird about the US not wanting to be directly at war with Russia actually. What's weird is that people in the west wholeheartedly supported this proxy war in which the west was cynically using Ukraine to fight Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    As kissinger said, its . Much more lethal to be Americas friend than its enemy.

    Exactly as in 2014, ukraine can get better deal from Russia than west. The only reason west will support ukraine is to funnel weapons to support terrorism against new russia.

    Deal is aweful to accept for Ukraine, and only zelensky corruption could result in it.

  • source
  • parent