Chess (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

Source unknown, some sites assign it to Oppressive Silence comics by Ethan Vincent. But that website in the corner is shady

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Huh? I thought having no valid moves that wouldn't lead to the king's death was a loss. How DO you lose then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

    Have to put him in check, while also preventing him from moving into another spot that could also put him into check.

    This would likely have been a stalemate anyway.

    Edit: the bishop's existence didn't even register to me when I made this comment. More pieces are better, and yes, King and Queen are sufficient to mate. However, the fewer the pieces you have, the lower your chances of success.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    King and queen is fully sufficient to checkmate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    I said likely. I know it's sufficient, but it's not inevitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It is inevitable, there's no maybe about it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's possible to stalemate, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    This would likely have been a stalemate anyway.

    How come? I'm not very good at chess personally but I was under the impression that queen-bishop-king was generally sufficient to force a mate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment