587
submitted 1 year ago by shish_mish@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago

I don't know anything but isn't Guantanamo Bay, like, kinda small?

[-] ytorf@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago

That’s only an issue if you assume they’ll be treated with any humanity

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, they'll find a way to pack people in. Maybe some kind of high energy weight loss system like their role models used in the 1940s?

This is bad juju. The detention camps from the first cycle with this fascists was nothing on what we're seeing ramping up here.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Don’t worry, they’ll find a way to pack people in. Maybe some kind of high energy weight loss system like their role models used in the 1940s?

I'm sure they are already working on the final solution.

[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Now I want someone to ask trump "what's your final solution for these people?"

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At it's peak it held about 800 prisoners, kinda impossibly small for the numbers discussed here.

Edit-- Well, trump did say "Most people don’t even know that we have 30,000 beds in Guantanamo", I guess file me with most people. Must be incredible how they scaled up while simultaneously closing camps and losing facilities to disrepair, apparently.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 34 points 1 year ago

This feels like "how many dead babies can you fit in a trash can?"

Depends on how good your blender is.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

I must've missed that episode of "Will it Blend".

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't matter how many beds they have, Trump doesn't want them making it past the showers.

But I'm sure there will be all sorts of bipartisan and humanitarian oversight. Right?

Right?

It's not like you can just make a single "undocumented" person disappear. Let alone their whole nuclear family. What would the rest of their family say?

Probably "can I crash in your attic".

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's a camp where he plans to concentrate people.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I think that's a bonus for Trump. Also, Cuba should reject our lease on the land.

[-] FloMo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

To the best of my knowledge, although the U.S. makes “lease payments” on the land the prison sits on, they do not have the authorization of the Cuban government, which in turn has not cashed those checks.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh my God, what if they cashed them all at once and emptied out America's checking account.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

All the better for them to die faster of unliveable conditions, it seems

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
587 points (99.0% liked)

News

36457 readers
2818 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS