you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

https://ibb.co/wVNsn5H

https://ibb.co/HpK5G5Pp

https://ibb.co/sp1wGMFb

https://ibb.co/4wyKhkRH

https://ibb.co/WpBTZPRm

https://ibb.co/0yP73j6G

Note that my tests were via groq and the r1 70B distilled llama variant (the 2nd smartest version afaik)

Edit 1:

Incidentally... I propositioned a coworker to answer the same question. This is the summarized conversation I had:

Me: "Hey Billy, can you answer a question? in under 3 seconds answer my following question"

Billy: "sure"

Me: "How many As are in abracadabra 3.2.1"

Billy: "4" (answered in less than 3 seconds)

Me: "nope"

I'm gonna poll the office and see how many people get it right with the same opportunity the ai had.

Edit 2: The second coworker said "6" in about 5 seconds

Edit 3: Third coworker said 4, in 3 seconds

Edit 4: I asked two more people and one of them got it right... But I'm 60% sure she heard me asking the previous employee, but if she didnt we're at 1/5

In probably done with this game for the day.

I'm pretty flabbergasted with the results of my very unscientific experiment, but now I can say (with a mountain of anecdotal juice) that with letter counting, R1 70b is wildly faster and more accurate than humans .

  • source
  • parent