475
Facebook flags Linux topics as 'cybersecurity threats' — posts and users being blocked (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago (5 children)

One might get banned for opinions that are incompatible with certain instances. You can always open your own, and build a community of similar minded individuals. But never expect everyone to federate with you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] -23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    That's still a problem. It really doesn't make the community look good. I think that also creates an issue similar to Big Tech networks where you don't get opinions from all sides of arguments (unless you have many accounts on many instances).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    On the contrary, it makes the community look good not to federate with everyone. There are instances that are so toxic that I'm really happy not to have them around. Let the gun-lovers, fascists, the Russian mouthpieces, the spammers, etc. have their place, but don't offer them the platfor they don't deserve.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Your broad claim and what is actually being banned on instances makes it seem you want to include questionable if not destructive opinions.

    Can you be more concrete? What are you missing, and where?

    What banned content that couldn't find a home on another instance do you want to see?

    Do you think opinions should be shareable in any form, or only in respectful form?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •