this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
14 points (85.0% liked)
Casual Conversation
1956 readers
139 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 1/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Late stage capitalism sucks, yet I have a corporate middle management job and I drink Coke and I drive a Toyota and I'm surfing Lemmy on a Google device. I don't think I'm trolling. And I don't know if it's even that contrarian. "There is no ethical consumption under capitalism"; unless I am ready to die, I have to participate in the system.
Thanks for saying that. I get a LOT of people who follow me on Lemmy and call me a troll. As in, there was a thread started last week to try to ban me from the entire fediverse (which of course didn't work).
But I'm not a troll, I just have lots of different varying and seemingly opposing viewpoints. It's not done "to spite others," it's done "in spite of others."
That's why I think you and I are different than trolls and/or hypocrites.
So maybe contrarian isn't the right word, but I don't know what else I would call it. But I don't have seemingly opposing views to piss people off. It's just how I am.
My hate-fanclub peeps worked on this just last week. Notice the 318 upvotes to get rid of me:
I said I'm not trolling.
I would rather not associate myself too closely with someone who self-reportedly has to have multiple accounts to keep ahead of the criticism. I don't know you nor what your views are that make you so irritating to other Lemmy users.
And I'm not trolling either, which I also said. I was agreeing you.
Trolling is doing something to purposely annoy. It's intent. Just because someone calls one a troll, doesn't mean they are a troll.
I post a lot. And it's one of the factors that people use when calling me a troll. But I'm not a troll, nor do I have any intention of being one. That was my point.
And just because I agree with you doesn't mean you re suddenly "associated" with me. I promise your reputation won't be tarnished just because you and I agreed on something.
Thanks!
When you post that much on a small, not-very-popular-yet site, people are going to get tired of seeing you. I'm pretty sure I've blocked you at least once just because you were the ONLY content I was seeing on my front page. Why would I or anyone else come to a place like this and be ok with only seeing content from one user, or the same meme over and over with slightly varying formats?
Well like you said, I'm easy to block.
But I've never sent memes.
If I was the only content you were seeing, it's because no one is posting. I'm doing my part by posting content to the site. Feel free to post yours as well.
Thank you!