122
What are your thoughts on restricting children’s access to pornography online? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
181 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There are a lot of GOP-controller legislatures in the USA pushing through so-called “child protection” laws, but there’s a toll in the form of impacting people’s rights and data privacy. Most of these bills involve requiring adults to upload a copy of their photo ID.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 165 points 3 years ago (14 children)

Considering these are Republican states, they're just going to define Wikipedia articles about gender dysphoria as pornographic lol

Think carefully and double check before you ever agree with a Republican about anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    Think carefully and double check before you ever agree with a Republican politician about anything.

    FTFY

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 55 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    I guess, but like, there's only one party that wants me in a concentration conversion therapy camp for being trans.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    That doesn't make the rest automatically trustworthy. Just not genocidal. Though I tend to agree with Progressives and Socialist Dems or Socialists more often than not. Regular, middle of the road Dems, not as much.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -7 points 3 years ago

    Not genocidal eh? Ask a Democrat how many people they think Earth can support long term, then subtract that from Earth’s current population. Your answer is how many people they, at some level, believe need to be gone.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Perhaps, but it was a bipartisan effort that led to requiring ID to buy music.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Sure, and I'm not saying both parties don't want to surveil and control the population, but as you might be able to understand I'm a bit more focused on the Party that has all but made extermination of people like me the Party platform.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I’ve never heard anyone call for the extermination of queer communists (or whatever category you’re referring to).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I'm trans. If they simply take away my access to gender affirming care they're as good as murdering me, because I won't last long.

    Furthermore, they believe being trans is a mental illness and that we're all groomers and rapists. It's not much of a logical leap for them to then declare that they're "hospitalizing us" because we present a threat to ourselves and to public safety. They already call gender affirming care "self mutilation" and they actually believe that it's contagious and making their children trans. You're blind if you can't see where that's going.

    Me being a communist just gives them a reason to shoot me when we start WW3 with China lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •