you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Socialism does not mean controlled by the state, that is just a state service, which can be capitalist.

Socialism, and I cannot stress this enough, is not when the government does stuff

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Where did I say "government does stuff"? If a service is provided not for profit, funded by the community and is otherwise not privately owned, it's socialist. It needs to be for-profit and/or privately owned to be capitalist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    No, this type of thinking is anti-dialectical. Capitalism is a system where private property and commodity production is primary, and socialism is a system where collective ownership and planning is primary. This does not mean systems are partially Socialist and partially Capitalist, but that property relations are not uniform in most systems. I think reading Marx would be helpful for you.

  • source
  • parent