this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37801 readers
310 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I love the idea of taking on a monopoly, but I don’t like that, without regulation, it has a low chance of success, and the consumer gets to suffer as the monopoly fights back.
What's your basis for presuming low odds? I'm miles away from IT, but my layman's understanding is that while Arm has terrific IP, Qualcomm isn't exactly pushing the envelope with their custom designs despite/because of a de facto monopoly on high-end Android chips. The consumer is suffering under the current regime, and if licensing is going to get far more expensive, phonemakers aren't going to just eat margin.
I'm not a fan of the corporate oligarchy we find ourselves in, but it's important to accept that sometimes big companies make decisions that are good for consumers — if only because it's also good for the bottom line. To my mind, this is one such example.