Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
now that I think about it more, "sex Change surgeries on minors" are a genuine issue that happens quite regularly. however it's not the kind most people talk about.
I mean "corrective" surgery on intersex people, where the doctor often decides what gender the Child should be based on the size of the penis and then "corrects" or sometimes mutilates the baby's genitals.
that is also one of the rare scenarios where the kind of "sex change surgery on minors" that most people talk about could be relevant. just imagine the pain a boy would go through after hearing that the doctor cut up their genitals at birth because they didn't fit neatly into the binary that is expected of babies.
so, no. I don't think the kind of "sex change surhery on minors" you're talking about should be banned. it generally isn't a thing, and sometimes it's a good thing. we should focus on the horrible things that are done to intersex people.
There are a lot of (albeit impressive) rhetorical smokes screens I'm choosing not to engage with, but there are many interesting points of conversation to be had here.
Staying on topic here:
This is an interesting take. If it's sometimes a good thing, why does it matter whether or not it's generally a thing? And, what evidence do you have that allowing them to be legal tends to do more good than harm?
It's fair to fearmonger over this topic. It causes severe harm and injury to the children who get it in the vast majority of cases. You're right that it's also important to talk about how few people are actually getting these surgeries, it has no bearing on whether or not it should be legal.
Is your argument that mutilating children during infancy should be legal, or illegal? Or, is your argument that sex change surgeries should be allowed to reverse such mutilation? If it's the latter, would you say that's the only type of sex change operations available for minors?
big fucking yikes.