▲ 1588 ▼ Fuck Musk, Fuck "X" (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 2 years ago by FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) Deleted permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] De_Narm@lemmy.world -25 points 2 years ago (1 child) He may be the inventor of politics for all I care, credentials are no indicator of truth. A claim such as this needs some data, otherwise it's not much better than any right-wing conspiracy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Isn’t it obvious from his tweet that he doesn’t have data, therefore, his conclusion must be based on personal experience and input from others. Which is why he doesn’t call for twitter to be banned, but for it to be investigated. And regardless there have been multiple credible news stories and even US government reports on pro-Trump bot networks on twitter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] De_Narm@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is obvious, you're right. I just feel like the proper course of action wouldn't have been a claim and a demand for an investigation. Maybe ask others for their experiences and link a petition for people to sign, should they share this feeling, and start an investigation that way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago I feel like compiling receipts (a list of known/suspected bot accounts) and then following the paper trail would be a good idea... like Wolverine hunting down the school bomber during Civil War permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago Arf Arf Arf! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] De_Narm@lemmy.world -25 points 2 years ago (1 child) He may be the inventor of politics for all I care, credentials are no indicator of truth. A claim such as this needs some data, otherwise it's not much better than any right-wing conspiracy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Isn’t it obvious from his tweet that he doesn’t have data, therefore, his conclusion must be based on personal experience and input from others. Which is why he doesn’t call for twitter to be banned, but for it to be investigated. And regardless there have been multiple credible news stories and even US government reports on pro-Trump bot networks on twitter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] De_Narm@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is obvious, you're right. I just feel like the proper course of action wouldn't have been a claim and a demand for an investigation. Maybe ask others for their experiences and link a petition for people to sign, should they share this feeling, and start an investigation that way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago I feel like compiling receipts (a list of known/suspected bot accounts) and then following the paper trail would be a good idea... like Wolverine hunting down the school bomber during Civil War permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago Arf Arf Arf! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Isn’t it obvious from his tweet that he doesn’t have data, therefore, his conclusion must be based on personal experience and input from others. Which is why he doesn’t call for twitter to be banned, but for it to be investigated. And regardless there have been multiple credible news stories and even US government reports on pro-Trump bot networks on twitter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] De_Narm@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is obvious, you're right. I just feel like the proper course of action wouldn't have been a claim and a demand for an investigation. Maybe ask others for their experiences and link a petition for people to sign, should they share this feeling, and start an investigation that way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago I feel like compiling receipts (a list of known/suspected bot accounts) and then following the paper trail would be a good idea... like Wolverine hunting down the school bomber during Civil War permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago Arf Arf Arf! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] De_Narm@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is obvious, you're right. I just feel like the proper course of action wouldn't have been a claim and a demand for an investigation. Maybe ask others for their experiences and link a petition for people to sign, should they share this feeling, and start an investigation that way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago I feel like compiling receipts (a list of known/suspected bot accounts) and then following the paper trail would be a good idea... like Wolverine hunting down the school bomber during Civil War permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago Arf Arf Arf! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago I feel like compiling receipts (a list of known/suspected bot accounts) and then following the paper trail would be a good idea... like Wolverine hunting down the school bomber during Civil War permalink fedilink source parent
