French immigrants are eating our pets!

A picture of a tool to detect AI-generated photos. The photo is a snail with a cat head and it says "not likely to be AI-generated or Deepfake". Showing a 2% of chances to be AI-generated.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago

There are a bunch of reasons why this could happen. First, it's possible to "attack" some simpler image classification models; if you get a large enough sample of their outputs, you can mathematically derive a way to process any image such that it won't be correctly identified. There have also been reports that even simpler processing, such as blending a real photo of a wall with a synthetic image at very low percent, can trip up detectors that haven't been trained to be more discerning. But it's all in how you construct the training dataset, and I don't think any of this is a good enough reason to give up on using machine learning for synthetic media detection in general; in fact this example gives me the idea of using autogenerated captions as an additional input to the classification model. The challenge there, as in general, is trying to keep such a model from assuming that all anime is synthetic, since "AI artists" seem to be overly focused on anime and related styles...

  • source