▲ 973 ▼ Google's New Web Environment Integrity Proposal Dismissed by Brave, Mozilla, and Vivaldi (news.itsfoss.com) submitted 3 years ago by nils@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org 106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Why so? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) I believe I remember they had a crypto thing going on permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ichbinjasokreativ@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) they will show you their own ads through operating system notifications, but without collecting your personal data to do so. the program is also entirely opt-in and is thus disabled by default, so the user has to knowingly and willingly enable it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) without collecting your personal data to do so. Meaning the ads will be significantly lower quality. I doubt they have anywhere near as good performance as regular ads, meaning they'll likely have sketchier ads that are willing to pay more to reach a less specific audience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phoenixes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago They also "pay" an absolute pittance if you have them enabled — something like 2 cents per ad, if I remember my calculations correctly. Literally nobody should be considering that trade worth it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 point 3 years ago Yeah but who cares about that permalink fedilink source parent [–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) They guy that founded brave only did so after getting fired from Mozilla for homophobia permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AfterAll@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) WHAT!? That's wild, and the first I'm hearing of this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mannivu@feddit.it 5 points 3 years ago I heard this for the first time too, but it looks like they're right https://web.archive.org/web/20191223181612/https://leafandcore.com/2016/09/03/brave-is-a-browser-that-could-save-the-web-but-its-from-an-awful-person/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) I believe I remember they had a crypto thing going on permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ichbinjasokreativ@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) they will show you their own ads through operating system notifications, but without collecting your personal data to do so. the program is also entirely opt-in and is thus disabled by default, so the user has to knowingly and willingly enable it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) without collecting your personal data to do so. Meaning the ads will be significantly lower quality. I doubt they have anywhere near as good performance as regular ads, meaning they'll likely have sketchier ads that are willing to pay more to reach a less specific audience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phoenixes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago They also "pay" an absolute pittance if you have them enabled — something like 2 cents per ad, if I remember my calculations correctly. Literally nobody should be considering that trade worth it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 point 3 years ago Yeah but who cares about that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) they will show you their own ads through operating system notifications, but without collecting your personal data to do so. the program is also entirely opt-in and is thus disabled by default, so the user has to knowingly and willingly enable it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) without collecting your personal data to do so. Meaning the ads will be significantly lower quality. I doubt they have anywhere near as good performance as regular ads, meaning they'll likely have sketchier ads that are willing to pay more to reach a less specific audience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phoenixes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago They also "pay" an absolute pittance if you have them enabled — something like 2 cents per ad, if I remember my calculations correctly. Literally nobody should be considering that trade worth it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) without collecting your personal data to do so. Meaning the ads will be significantly lower quality. I doubt they have anywhere near as good performance as regular ads, meaning they'll likely have sketchier ads that are willing to pay more to reach a less specific audience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phoenixes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago They also "pay" an absolute pittance if you have them enabled — something like 2 cents per ad, if I remember my calculations correctly. Literally nobody should be considering that trade worth it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phoenixes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago They also "pay" an absolute pittance if you have them enabled — something like 2 cents per ad, if I remember my calculations correctly. Literally nobody should be considering that trade worth it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 point 3 years ago Yeah but who cares about that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) They guy that founded brave only did so after getting fired from Mozilla for homophobia permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AfterAll@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) WHAT!? That's wild, and the first I'm hearing of this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mannivu@feddit.it 5 points 3 years ago I heard this for the first time too, but it looks like they're right https://web.archive.org/web/20191223181612/https://leafandcore.com/2016/09/03/brave-is-a-browser-that-could-save-the-web-but-its-from-an-awful-person/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AfterAll@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) WHAT!? That's wild, and the first I'm hearing of this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mannivu@feddit.it 5 points 3 years ago I heard this for the first time too, but it looks like they're right https://web.archive.org/web/20191223181612/https://leafandcore.com/2016/09/03/brave-is-a-browser-that-could-save-the-web-but-its-from-an-awful-person/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 5 points 3 years ago I heard this for the first time too, but it looks like they're right https://web.archive.org/web/20191223181612/https://leafandcore.com/2016/09/03/brave-is-a-browser-that-could-save-the-web-but-its-from-an-awful-person/ permalink fedilink source parent