If you have uBlock Origin, you might notice Chrome automatically disabling the extension.

Google Chrome has begun to phase out uBlock Origin. The developer of the free ad blocker, Raymond Hill, recently reposted a screenshot that shows Chrome automatically turning off uBlock Origin because it is “no longer supported.”

The change comes as Google Chrome migrates to Manifest V3, a new extension specification that could impact the effectiveness of some ad blockers. uBlock Origin has launched uBlock Origin Lite, which uses Manifest V3, in response to the transition. However, you have to manually install the extension because it’s “too different from uBO to be an automatic replacement,” according to a FAQ Hill that posted to GitHub.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 174 points 2 years ago (29 children)

Or time to switch to Firefox

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I've been a firefox supporter since netscape.

    That said, things aren't going great.

    Because it's market share is in the toilet more and more web sites just aren't supporting it any more. My university's website, some government websites, and 2x industry platforms I use for work just plain do not work in firefox.

    Mozilla just bought an advertising company. They can spin it as they like but basically, mozilla's primary revenue source in the future is going to be ads.

    They just had a throw down with the developer of uBlock. I don't think this is particularly meaningful, but it's not a tick in the right column.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Nothing a user agent spoofing extension can’t fix.

    Also, if anyone has concerns about Firefox there are some really interesting forks.

    Zen has been my go to for a couple of weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Why is that? Folks aren't going round writing user agent parsers to maliciously disable functionality in Firefox. They're just writing bad code that doesn't work on anything but the browser they use.

    I use Firefox mainly because I don't trust Google and at work it ensured at least one of us sees bugs that chrome users don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    When I say "aren't supporting" I mean "not testing". These sites are broken.

    All Firefox forks in existence are merely soft forks. They're not committing code, they just compile with different flags and configure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not entirely accurate.

    Zen brings a number of additions that even the Mozilla team have taken note of regarding features they hope to implement down the road.

    Ref: (ff engineer taking about zen’s implementation - that’s not enabling feature flags) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41307555

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    I have, and as a tab hoarder, the transition has been rough. I really miss the tab grouping feature from Chrome, and I haven't found any FF extension that suitably replaces it.

    I had already switched to mobile Firefox years ago for extension (uBlock) support, and that was an easy transition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Thankfully, as a long-time Firefox user, I've never been pampered by this magical feature and so it's not something I miss. Perhaps a chrome exodus will cause Firefox to pick it up though.

    Then again, I'm currently wearing a tinfoil hat that says, "Mozilla's CEO is a Google sleeper agent" so I'm about 50/50 on whether or not Mozilla will just straight-up fold in a couple years; but there's still the half that's hopeful!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Bookmarks are the better tabs for tab hoarders

    Just saying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you want to take a chance relying on a system meant to store temporary data to store permanent/semi-permanent information then go ahead, I'll continue using the bookmarks bar and never worry about an update erasing all my tabs :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The tab grouping is the only thing I keep going back to chrome for on mobile. I spend of surprising amount of time deep diving certain things and it really helps to keep all the branches of the tree together in one group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I prefer FF, but if it helps you the Vivaldi Browser is Chromium based and will continue to support the v2 Manifest (old extensions) until July 2025. That might buy you time. Who knows what the landscape and options exist then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    When I switched to Firefox a while back, I also switched to using the Tree Style Tabs extension. It gives you vertical tabs which can be nested like a folder structure. I found it's way more convenient to know which tab was spawned from a parent tab, and keep similar tabs all in one little grouping. In my opinion, it's even better than Chrome's tab grouping. I lose a tiny amount of screen real estate along the left side of the browser, but it really didn't take long at all to get used to, and now I vastly prefer it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I recommend giving Sidebery a shot. It allows you to use a vertical list of tabs instead, that follow a tree hierarchy, so you can have an entire group together and collapsable. Before it was Tree Style Tabs, but development of that seems to have slowed to a stop.

  • source
  • parent