this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
1017 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59080 readers
3652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wayback Machine back in read-only mode after DDoS, may need further maintenance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

One of the rare use cases of a blockchain actually being useful. A federated internet archive that uses a blockchain to validate that the saved data has not been altered by a malicious actor trying to tamper with proofs

That would be really cool but horribly inefficient because of the sheer amount of storage required

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

The thing is sometimed articles must be removed from IA (copyright (I disagree with that one) or when information is leaked that could threaten lives), with a blockchain this would be impossible

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

this would be impossible

Perfect.

I'd be interested in seeing real examples where lives are threatened. I find it unlikely that the internet archive would be the exclusive arbiter of so-called deadly information

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There was an actual example where a journalistic article about afghanistan accidentally leaked names of some sources and people who helped westerners in afghanistan, which did actually endanger those people’s lives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If they're leaked, they're leaked. The archive doesn't change that one way or the other

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Gotcha so you actually stated your previous question in bad faith as you had no interest in the answer to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No. The archive of it isn't doing the dangerous part. The info was already out there and the bad actor who would do something malicious would get that info from the same place the archive did. I need you to show how the archival of information that was already released leads to a dangerous situation that didn't already exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)