you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 127 points 3 years ago (2 children)

So like 8% of the market, mostly from Mozilla?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 57 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)
  • [+] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I don't care about Manifest V3. I care about ublock origin.
    When that stops working, then I'll swap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Aren't Vivaldi and Brave downstream of chromium though 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Vivaldi and Brave can modify Chromium to disable this feature. Chromium is open source after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    are they forks? That's what I don't get, who controls the merge controls into Chromium's main branch? It's open source, but who actually says yay or nay on PRs getting in? I assume it's Google, and the others are all forks off, but if it makes it into the main branch or not will really decide if it gets adopted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    They can, but their very existence increases the Chromium engine's market share and therefore Google's control of the web, allowing them to do stuff like this. Once this is implemented in Chrome then these browsers will just become "Chrome but it can't play netflix/access bank websites/etc" or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Goggle standard approach to it, is to integrate it so much with other components that it will be a lot of work to disable it, eventually making it impractical.

    The right way would be for those clients to switch to gecko engine.

  • source
  • parent