you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

They don't have any, they just know you're supposed to say "take to the streets" because they think they're a 1960s radical rehearsing boomer protest tactics. As though things might not have changed in the last 60 years.

Counter-protest tactics have continuously adapted and evolved -- from technology to legislation to media manipulation. Protest tactics have not kept pace, evidenced by the fact that this person thinks street protests have created effective change in the last 20 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    If you follow the thread here, this is in a US context (the "we" referenced by the commenter), and it's about "non-violent" protests, given the commenter said violent protests have been "protracted" with "low rates of success." Euromaidan activists seized the government quarter by force and stormed Yanukovych's mansion.

    While I take your point, this isn't a particularly illustrative example in this context.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No this is exactly what it looks like. They filled the streets and they didn't go into his mansion until he fled after the Army turned on him for using lethal force against the crowd.

    Just like the water hoses and dogs picture was very resonant in the US. The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

    A year is an extraordinarily long time with an illegitimate occupant of the White House, pardoning himself for anything he chooses to do.

    I don't think the measures that were effective during the civil rights era are at all suitable for addressing such a fundamental breach of the constitution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments