you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

am I the only one who understood this as the dude claiming the burguers flippers being the skilled labour, as in, trying to show solidarity?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I took it as the total reverse.

    That he "doing skilled labor" packing boxes at Amazon is above somebody "flipping burgers" at McDonald's.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    If working at McD's can be stereotyped with the phrase "flipping burgers", I propose that packaging things at an Amazon warehouse be called something like... "boxing dildos".

    One actually handles food.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's ambiguous, though. They could be complaining about the frycooks making as much as them, or about the frycooks not making as much as them. You'd have to look at what else they posted to see whether they're generally pro-labor or not. Or ask them what they mean by their tweet. Both of which are made difficult by the username being blocked out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    It really isn't ambiguous at all, imo. He's clearly saying flipping burgers isn't skilled labour. Like that's literally what the sentence means, as he's comparing flipping burgers to "skilled labour", which he wouldn't do if he thought "flipping burgers" is "skilled labour".

    He says he'll be "damned" if what he says are unskilled worked at McDonald's would be paid as much as him — who identifies as someone doing "skilled labour"

  • source
  • parent