▲ 756 ▼ A new trend in tipping emerges (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 286 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Snekeyes@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) Funny how there's been 27 amendments tho permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Did you read about the process to change Amendments? Do you think there's any chance that 3/4 of the 50 states in the USA would ever vote in agreement to abolish their own right to bear arms? I'm confident enough that will not happen that I will bet you $5000 that it does not happen in the next 30 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) !RemindMe 30 years permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I just hope I'm around that long to win that bet permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snekeyes@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) 27 times already. I'd say the math works. The Repubeicans are at their end. This is their last kicks. They know the world is changing and they are not in favor. That's why they have the corrupt syrpeme court in a attempt to get in what the minority wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're not very informed if you think only Republicans support the right to bear arms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Yeah, historically it should be the people-focused parties that really want the people to be armed, not the business-focused parties. Of course the people-focused party here is also the big-government party, so that muddies things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Did you read about the process to change Amendments? Do you think there's any chance that 3/4 of the 50 states in the USA would ever vote in agreement to abolish their own right to bear arms? I'm confident enough that will not happen that I will bet you $5000 that it does not happen in the next 30 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) !RemindMe 30 years permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I just hope I'm around that long to win that bet permalink fedilink source parent [–] Snekeyes@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) 27 times already. I'd say the math works. The Repubeicans are at their end. This is their last kicks. They know the world is changing and they are not in favor. That's why they have the corrupt syrpeme court in a attempt to get in what the minority wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're not very informed if you think only Republicans support the right to bear arms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Yeah, historically it should be the people-focused parties that really want the people to be armed, not the business-focused parties. Of course the people-focused party here is also the big-government party, so that muddies things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) !RemindMe 30 years permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I just hope I'm around that long to win that bet permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I just hope I'm around that long to win that bet permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Snekeyes@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) 27 times already. I'd say the math works. The Repubeicans are at their end. This is their last kicks. They know the world is changing and they are not in favor. That's why they have the corrupt syrpeme court in a attempt to get in what the minority wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're not very informed if you think only Republicans support the right to bear arms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Yeah, historically it should be the people-focused parties that really want the people to be armed, not the business-focused parties. Of course the people-focused party here is also the big-government party, so that muddies things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're not very informed if you think only Republicans support the right to bear arms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Yeah, historically it should be the people-focused parties that really want the people to be armed, not the business-focused parties. Of course the people-focused party here is also the big-government party, so that muddies things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Yeah, historically it should be the people-focused parties that really want the people to be armed, not the business-focused parties. Of course the people-focused party here is also the big-government party, so that muddies things. permalink fedilink source parent