you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There’s a long, documented, researched, history of men being raised to expect things from women.

I find the implication that there is not also a long, documented, researched, history of women being raised to expect things from men, quite amusing in its ignorance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    That is in absolutely no way implied by that statement; the existance of a truth does not imply the existance of it's inverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    yes but focusing on one side of the discussion ignoring its counterpart is a clear sign of bias, so despite being technically correct it's unhelpful

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    What?? Keeping a discussion to one aspect of a topic is absolutely not an example of bias, it's an example of contextual scope. It's the only reason we can have a discussion about anything without having to include the full context it's situated within (which would be the entire universe).

  • source
  • parent