this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
132 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17602 readers
764 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Funny how people were interpreting the survey itself as a way to pretend that everybody wanted AI even when they didn't - yet somehow it was possible that it didn't end up in the top 10 ๐Ÿ˜…

(Also understandably, this won't be 1:1 the roadmap, for the caveats they mentioned in the post. Still helpful!)

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because people don't understand statistics. The survey was very well made.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Agreed, the survey was pretty decent. My biggest complaint, however, was that there wasn't an option for "don't want," only "want least." Sometimes I got three options that I actually do want, and sometimes I got two that I definitely don't want, and I think it would be useful to communicate that.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do you weigh a Don't Want with Want Most? A 0.1 weighting is much more useful than a negative weighting. And it is rightfully phrased so.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I would weigh a don't want the same as want least. I just had a couple situations where two options were both "don't want," and I wish I could have communicated that instead of picking one to be in the middle. I don't think the same should be true of "want most" though, I should be forced to rank those. But for two things I really don't care about, ordering doesn't convey any extra useful information.

load more comments (4 replies)