▲ 39 ▼ Strawberry fields forever — OpenAI’s new ‘o1’ model (pivot-to-ai.com) submitted 2 years ago by dgerard@awful.systems [M] to c/techtakes@awful.systems 30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 16 points 2 years ago (21 children) they say a lot of things, yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [+] tee9000@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (20 children) Are you saying thats not true? Anything to substaniate your claim? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] flowerysong@awful.systems 22 points 2 years ago (17 children) "this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources" <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago "we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn't pressed, so we pressed it" permalink fedilink source parent [+] tee9000@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago (15 children) I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts. Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity. Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) Cake day: September 13th, 2024 holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent [–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (3 children) I often use prompts Well, there's your problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I read this in Justin Roczniak's voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent [–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. If only you'd asked ChatGPT "is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I asked Gemini! is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs Reply: I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website. Here are some things to consider: LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions. Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances. If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline. SLANDER, I SAY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. we need something for this kind of "I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding" shit, in the style of JAQing off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage permalink fedilink source parent [–] V0ldek@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Kay mate, rational thought 101: When the setup is "we run each query multiple times" the default position is that it costs more resources. If you claim they use roughly the same amount you need to substantiate that claim. Like, that sounds like a pretty impressive CS paper, "we figured out how to run inference N times but pay roughly the cost of one" is a hell of an abstract. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago ".....we pay for one, suckers VCs pay for the other 45" permalink fedilink source parent
[+] tee9000@lemmy.world -9 points 2 years ago (20 children) Are you saying thats not true? Anything to substaniate your claim? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] flowerysong@awful.systems 22 points 2 years ago (17 children) "this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources" <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago "we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn't pressed, so we pressed it" permalink fedilink source parent [+] tee9000@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago (15 children) I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts. Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity. Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) Cake day: September 13th, 2024 holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent [–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (3 children) I often use prompts Well, there's your problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I read this in Justin Roczniak's voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent [–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. If only you'd asked ChatGPT "is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I asked Gemini! is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs Reply: I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website. Here are some things to consider: LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions. Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances. If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline. SLANDER, I SAY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. we need something for this kind of "I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding" shit, in the style of JAQing off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage permalink fedilink source parent [–] V0ldek@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Kay mate, rational thought 101: When the setup is "we run each query multiple times" the default position is that it costs more resources. If you claim they use roughly the same amount you need to substantiate that claim. Like, that sounds like a pretty impressive CS paper, "we figured out how to run inference N times but pay roughly the cost of one" is a hell of an abstract. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago ".....we pay for one, suckers VCs pay for the other 45" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flowerysong@awful.systems 22 points 2 years ago (17 children) "this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources" <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago "we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn't pressed, so we pressed it" permalink fedilink source parent [+] tee9000@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago (15 children) I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts. Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity. Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) Cake day: September 13th, 2024 holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent [–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (3 children) I often use prompts Well, there's your problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I read this in Justin Roczniak's voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent [–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. If only you'd asked ChatGPT "is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I asked Gemini! is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs Reply: I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website. Here are some things to consider: LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions. Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances. If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline. SLANDER, I SAY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. we need something for this kind of "I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding" shit, in the style of JAQing off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage permalink fedilink source parent
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago "we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn't pressed, so we pressed it" permalink fedilink source parent
[+] tee9000@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago (15 children) I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts. Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity. Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) Cake day: September 13th, 2024 holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent [–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (3 children) I often use prompts Well, there's your problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I read this in Justin Roczniak's voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent [–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. If only you'd asked ChatGPT "is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I asked Gemini! is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs Reply: I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website. Here are some things to consider: LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions. Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances. If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline. SLANDER, I SAY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. we need something for this kind of "I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding" shit, in the style of JAQing off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) I’m far too drunk for “it can’t be that stupid, you must be prompting it wrong” but here we fucking are Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. oh no shit? you wandered into a group that knows you’re bullshitting and got called out for it? wonder of fucking wonders permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) Cake day: September 13th, 2024 holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) Cake day: September 13th, 2024 holy fuck they registered 2 days ago and 9 out of 10 of their posts are specifically about the new horseshit ChatGPT model and they’re gonna pretend they didn’t come here specifically to advertise for that exact horseshit oh im just a smol bean uwu promptfan doing fucking work for OpenAI advertising for their new model on a fucking Saturday night permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) and as for more important news: the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner but their tequila’s still excellent permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent [–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago the Costco scotch isn’t good, its flavor profile is mostly paint thinner even bad bathtub gin sounds more appealing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Kirkland Signature bottled-in-bond Bourbon is well worth the price. Not the best but surprisingly decent. And this concludes my shameless plug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago a lot of their liquor is surprisingly very good! that’s why it’s also surprising how bad their scotch is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (3 children) I often use prompts Well, there's your problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I read this in Justin Roczniak's voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I read this in Justin Roczniak's voice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) @o7___o7 @blakestacey yay Liam permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago [ACTIONABLE THREATS] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. If only you'd asked ChatGPT "is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I asked Gemini! is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs Reply: I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website. Here are some things to consider: LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions. Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances. If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline. SLANDER, I SAY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) I asked Gemini! is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs Reply: I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website. Here are some things to consider: LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions. Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances. If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline. SLANDER, I SAY permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content. oof, this one stings also now I’m paranoid the shitheads who operate the various clouds will make the mistake of using the LLM as a malware detector without realizing it’s probably just matching the token for the TLD permalink fedilink source parent
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here. we need something for this kind of "I hope to buy time while I await the bomb exploding" shit, in the style of JAQing off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago see we were supposed to fall all over ourselves and debate this random stranger’s awful points. we weren’t supposed to respond to their disappointment with “good, fuck off” because then they can’t turn the whole thread into garbage permalink fedilink source parent
[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Kay mate, rational thought 101: When the setup is "we run each query multiple times" the default position is that it costs more resources. If you claim they use roughly the same amount you need to substantiate that claim. Like, that sounds like a pretty impressive CS paper, "we figured out how to run inference N times but pay roughly the cost of one" is a hell of an abstract. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago ".....we pay for one, suckers VCs pay for the other 45" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago ".....we pay for one, suckers VCs pay for the other 45" permalink fedilink source parent