you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 55 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Theres one person there whose actually making sense, and I think theyre a hexbear poster (its cowbee).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Holy shit, this one reply you got is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read lmao

    What you call a ‘Process of Material Reality’ could as easily be called G*d or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    I had to log off, I was getting genuinely upset. It doesn't get better, they get even worse

    On the other hand... tagline?

    Here it is:

    "When could we have voted for a 90% tax rate?"

    Eisenhower's presidency did see some tax rates above 90%, but that figure only applied to the individual income taxes of top earners. For married people filing jointly in 1953, for example, any income above $200,000 was taxed at 90%, above $300,000 at 91%, and above $400,000 at 92%.

    For someone who claims to know a lot about history, you sure are short on facts.

    And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please.

    smuglord

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please.

    What the absolute fuck does this even mean fidel-wut

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong.

    They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations.

    agony-limitless

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How do you argue with them? Genuinely, i could feel my brain seeping out my ears just perusing the comment section.

    Also good work stalin-heart

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Inside Cowbee there are two wolves

    two-wolves-1 two-wolves-2

    @Cowbee@lemmy.ml vs. @Cowbee@hexbear.net

    Lemmy.ml Cowbee is a cringe debatebro badeline-disgust

    Hexbear.net Cowbee is a chill dude badeline-heh

    Is this dialectics? thinkin-lenin

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments