▲ 146 ▼ Libs trying not to blame communists for the holocaust challenge (impossible) (midwest.social) submitted 2 years ago by archomrade@midwest.social to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net 53 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://lemmy.world/post/19730104
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Holy shit, this one reply you got is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read lmao What you call a ‘Process of Material Reality’ could as easily be called G*d or the Flying Spaghetti Monster. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I had to log off, I was getting genuinely upset. It doesn't get better, they get even worse On the other hand... tagline? Here it is: "When could we have voted for a 90% tax rate?" Eisenhower's presidency did see some tax rates above 90%, but that figure only applied to the individual income taxes of top earners. For married people filing jointly in 1953, for example, any income above $200,000 was taxed at 90%, above $300,000 at 91%, and above $400,000 at 92%. For someone who claims to know a lot about history, you sure are short on facts. And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (3 children) And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. What the absolute fuck does this even mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong. They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago Idk but it's easy to fulfill. Here's a picture of one square meter in a world-historical hurricane permalink fedilink source parent [–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago Post History's hog if you're so in love with it, NOW. permalink fedilink source parent [–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And if climate change is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of extreme weather events happening, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of climate change, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Holy shit, this one reply you got is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read lmao What you call a ‘Process of Material Reality’ could as easily be called G*d or the Flying Spaghetti Monster. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I had to log off, I was getting genuinely upset. It doesn't get better, they get even worse On the other hand... tagline? Here it is: "When could we have voted for a 90% tax rate?" Eisenhower's presidency did see some tax rates above 90%, but that figure only applied to the individual income taxes of top earners. For married people filing jointly in 1953, for example, any income above $200,000 was taxed at 90%, above $300,000 at 91%, and above $400,000 at 92%. For someone who claims to know a lot about history, you sure are short on facts. And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (3 children) And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. What the absolute fuck does this even mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong. They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago Idk but it's easy to fulfill. Here's a picture of one square meter in a world-historical hurricane permalink fedilink source parent [–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago Post History's hog if you're so in love with it, NOW. permalink fedilink source parent [–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And if climate change is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of extreme weather events happening, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of climate change, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) I had to log off, I was getting genuinely upset. It doesn't get better, they get even worse On the other hand... tagline? Here it is: "When could we have voted for a 90% tax rate?" Eisenhower's presidency did see some tax rates above 90%, but that figure only applied to the individual income taxes of top earners. For married people filing jointly in 1953, for example, any income above $200,000 was taxed at 90%, above $300,000 at 91%, and above $400,000 at 92%. For someone who claims to know a lot about history, you sure are short on facts. And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (3 children) And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. What the absolute fuck does this even mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong. They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago Idk but it's easy to fulfill. Here's a picture of one square meter in a world-historical hurricane permalink fedilink source parent [–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago Post History's hog if you're so in love with it, NOW. permalink fedilink source parent [–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And if climate change is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of extreme weather events happening, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of climate change, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (3 children) And if history is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of people doing things, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of history, please. What the absolute fuck does this even mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong. They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago Idk but it's easy to fulfill. Here's a picture of one square meter in a world-historical hurricane permalink fedilink source parent [–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago Post History's hog if you're so in love with it, NOW. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 38 points 2 years ago If I'm being generous, I legitimately think they just have no clue what I am getting at by trying to baby step them through Historical Materislism, and can't fathom the idea that Great Man Theory is wrong. They're so cooked I walked away, it was beyond medium-rare, beyond well-done, call that congratulations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago Idk but it's easy to fulfill. Here's a picture of one square meter in a world-historical hurricane permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago Post History's hog if you're so in love with it, NOW. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) And if climate change is a 'physical process' post some pictures of it working. Not pictures of extreme weather events happening, because that would prove my point. A discrete physical embodiment of climate change, please. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent