this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
147 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

7128 readers
274 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But researchers say focusing on the environmental impacts and potential health harms of the finished products alone hides their actual environmental impact. Manufacturing Teflon and other fluoropolymers uses other, more dangerous PFAS chemicals. These compounds are known to contaminate the environment surrounding manufacturing facilities, said Rainer Lohmann, a professor of oceanography at the University of Rhode Island.

"Basically, anywhere where there's a major fluoropolymer producer, they seem to have succeeded in contaminating the entire region with their production process," he said.

The ministry's move to remove fluoropolymers from its proposed rules suggests those industry lobbying efforts have worked, MacDonald said. Using a study with self-declared ties to the chemical industry to back up the ministry's decision to exclude fluoropolymers "just kind of shows a little bit of what's happening behind the scenes in terms of where the government is taking the industry's word," she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Remember how aerospace corporations were allowed to self regulate and then Boeing killed 300 people, had a flight drop 300 feet in a second and had a non-door fly off?

relying on research by chemical industry researchers

🀑

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember when realtors were allowed to self regulate?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Remember when banks were allowed to weaken regulation and move towards self-assessing risk and capital adequacy levels?