▲ 292 ▼ Anybody watching the US Presidential debate right now? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by MataVatnik@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments Mfer literally quoted Orban. Bruuuuh
[–] danjoubu@lemmy.world 181 points 2 years ago (7 children) Moderators keep letting trump interrupt & talk over them. Bro just grow some balls & tell him to shut up & mute his shit permalink fedilink source hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] sh00g@lemmy.zip 118 points 2 years ago (1 child) I have been disappointed by that as well but this has been astoundingly good as far as debates have gone. The immediate fact checking is long overdue. And frankly I look forward to pointing at Trump's extra speaking time as a bulwark against the "iT wAs BiAsEd By ThE lIbErAL mOdErAtOrS" complaints. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 84 points 2 years ago (2 children) I’ve been genuinely impressed by their real-time fact checking. They’re swatting away every wild thing he says calmly and with specific examples of the truth. These moderators are incredibly well-prepared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (2 children) Hopefully that's the standard from now on. Unless Donny finally kicks the bucket we're probably gonna be seeing more of him even if he loses in November permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's no way the GOP will give him another chance after losing twice, especially with all the other baggage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Hahahahah. He is the gop now. Would be fun watching him shred the party to pieces from a jail cell. Not to celebrate to early or anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bacon_saber@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago Well there's no way they didn't know what to expect! permalink fedilink source parent [–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 years ago (1 child) 90% of the time Kamala finished her point perfectly before the mods started to interrupt. Respec Trump...was his disgusting self permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago* (2 children) And the best part was that when they did interrupt her, she finished her sentence, then stopped talking (Except for one time where it really looked like trump was gonna set her off but she still held up) I think it's safe to say this is without a doubt the best performance we've seen from a candidate against Trump, which imo really speaks to her ability to keep her composure under pressure, which isn't easy, especially when everybody expects you to be absolutely flawless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's cool, but I did like it when Biden told trump to shut up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If kamala had called trump a little bitch when talking about how he's still recovering being fired I would have lost it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago "This..." (long pause to make sure she doesn't say something stupid) "...former president" She didn't need to say it. The long pause said everything it needed to. Also, going over to shake his hand was such an alpha move and she knew it. Trump was pretty much rattled from that point onwards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago It was such a huge stage tonight and she was beyond solid. Like you said, the best democratic performance since... can't remember. maybe you didn't say now that I think about it. She came off so reasonable and nailed all the points that should do damage to a turd like Trump.(i'm fine with name calling) permalink fedilink source parent [–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world [S] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child) Thinking that same thing. For once just enforce the rules on this man baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem is that they would hone in on that and make the debate about that rather than Kamala. They took the L for her Win. It's shitty. But what they had to do to make her the focal point. He absolutely is gaslighting them to make it about what he wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Who is "they" in this context? If you're talking about trumpers, they're a lost cause, man. They're always going to have some alternate version of reality. The only way we're going to move forward as a country is if we stop worrying about what they're going to say or do. We cannot let the tyranny of the minority hold this country hostage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago speakers took the L for Kamala I think is what he means permalink fedilink source parent [–] azimir@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're afraid to be called unfair after he said that they'd be unfair. It's one of the strategies that us uses to suppress fighting back against his lies and ineptitude. First, your preemptively accuse someone of something. Second you do awful things that would normally rightfully get a response, but the authorities have to be careful otherwise you'll accuse them of doing the thing they should be doing. Third, you get your way even though you broke the rules, or you get to yell about how you knew, just knew! That you'd be treated badly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Fuck it man, just be unfair. He's going to say you were anyways, go scorched earth on the motherfucker. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago This has been a complaint across a dozen debates for 8 years now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Agree. They are just letting him prove what a crazy duck he is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) That was Harris's request, I thought. In the original terms for the Trump/Biden debate, each person's mic was shut off except when it was their turn to speak. Harris asked for that to be changed to allow interruptions, and Trump went along with it. If that's not working out for Harris, she should probably talk to her own team that wanted it, instead of whining about the moderators. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rob64@startrek.website 29 points 2 years ago (1 child) It worked out just fine for her. Gave him a chance to dig his own grave, which is what he did and what she wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 10 points 2 years ago (3 children) Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. It's disrespectful to talk over women and take up their time. The debate proves Harris's point that Sleepy DonOLD cares only about himself and goes to great lengths to tell more and more lies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. What did Eisenhower have to do with it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny That's literally his strongest selling point, his voters support him because he normalizes misogyny. If he ran over and slapped her to the floor they'd consider it a show of American Strength. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not a new development, dude. Do we really need to rehash the lessons of the last 8 years again? The people who vote for him don't care about your sensibilities. They like that he's rude and think it shows strength. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mic being active or not doesn't affect her hearing. If he interrupts her she'd still hear it, only the TV audience wouldn't, so she'd seem flustered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rob64@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago That's a really great point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sh00g@lemmy.zip 118 points 2 years ago (1 child) I have been disappointed by that as well but this has been astoundingly good as far as debates have gone. The immediate fact checking is long overdue. And frankly I look forward to pointing at Trump's extra speaking time as a bulwark against the "iT wAs BiAsEd By ThE lIbErAL mOdErAtOrS" complaints. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 84 points 2 years ago (2 children) I’ve been genuinely impressed by their real-time fact checking. They’re swatting away every wild thing he says calmly and with specific examples of the truth. These moderators are incredibly well-prepared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (2 children) Hopefully that's the standard from now on. Unless Donny finally kicks the bucket we're probably gonna be seeing more of him even if he loses in November permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's no way the GOP will give him another chance after losing twice, especially with all the other baggage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Hahahahah. He is the gop now. Would be fun watching him shred the party to pieces from a jail cell. Not to celebrate to early or anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bacon_saber@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago Well there's no way they didn't know what to expect! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 84 points 2 years ago (2 children) I’ve been genuinely impressed by their real-time fact checking. They’re swatting away every wild thing he says calmly and with specific examples of the truth. These moderators are incredibly well-prepared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (2 children) Hopefully that's the standard from now on. Unless Donny finally kicks the bucket we're probably gonna be seeing more of him even if he loses in November permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's no way the GOP will give him another chance after losing twice, especially with all the other baggage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Hahahahah. He is the gop now. Would be fun watching him shred the party to pieces from a jail cell. Not to celebrate to early or anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bacon_saber@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago Well there's no way they didn't know what to expect! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (2 children) Hopefully that's the standard from now on. Unless Donny finally kicks the bucket we're probably gonna be seeing more of him even if he loses in November permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's no way the GOP will give him another chance after losing twice, especially with all the other baggage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Hahahahah. He is the gop now. Would be fun watching him shred the party to pieces from a jail cell. Not to celebrate to early or anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's no way the GOP will give him another chance after losing twice, especially with all the other baggage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Hahahahah. He is the gop now. Would be fun watching him shred the party to pieces from a jail cell. Not to celebrate to early or anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Hahahahah. He is the gop now. Would be fun watching him shred the party to pieces from a jail cell. Not to celebrate to early or anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) As much as I want to agree I still don't think it's likely he'll ever see the inside of a cell. Not when the highest court in the land is almost entirely made up of his servants permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* To me, if trump loses, the charges will start piling up. Sure it may be years until he's actually punished but I wouldn't rule it out. Not with everything he is up against (so far). I'd bet money trump is committing more crimes to this day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bacon_saber@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago Well there's no way they didn't know what to expect! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 years ago (1 child) 90% of the time Kamala finished her point perfectly before the mods started to interrupt. Respec Trump...was his disgusting self permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago* (2 children) And the best part was that when they did interrupt her, she finished her sentence, then stopped talking (Except for one time where it really looked like trump was gonna set her off but she still held up) I think it's safe to say this is without a doubt the best performance we've seen from a candidate against Trump, which imo really speaks to her ability to keep her composure under pressure, which isn't easy, especially when everybody expects you to be absolutely flawless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's cool, but I did like it when Biden told trump to shut up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If kamala had called trump a little bitch when talking about how he's still recovering being fired I would have lost it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago "This..." (long pause to make sure she doesn't say something stupid) "...former president" She didn't need to say it. The long pause said everything it needed to. Also, going over to shake his hand was such an alpha move and she knew it. Trump was pretty much rattled from that point onwards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago It was such a huge stage tonight and she was beyond solid. Like you said, the best democratic performance since... can't remember. maybe you didn't say now that I think about it. She came off so reasonable and nailed all the points that should do damage to a turd like Trump.(i'm fine with name calling) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago* (2 children) And the best part was that when they did interrupt her, she finished her sentence, then stopped talking (Except for one time where it really looked like trump was gonna set her off but she still held up) I think it's safe to say this is without a doubt the best performance we've seen from a candidate against Trump, which imo really speaks to her ability to keep her composure under pressure, which isn't easy, especially when everybody expects you to be absolutely flawless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's cool, but I did like it when Biden told trump to shut up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If kamala had called trump a little bitch when talking about how he's still recovering being fired I would have lost it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago "This..." (long pause to make sure she doesn't say something stupid) "...former president" She didn't need to say it. The long pause said everything it needed to. Also, going over to shake his hand was such an alpha move and she knew it. Trump was pretty much rattled from that point onwards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago It was such a huge stage tonight and she was beyond solid. Like you said, the best democratic performance since... can't remember. maybe you didn't say now that I think about it. She came off so reasonable and nailed all the points that should do damage to a turd like Trump.(i'm fine with name calling) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's cool, but I did like it when Biden told trump to shut up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If kamala had called trump a little bitch when talking about how he's still recovering being fired I would have lost it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago "This..." (long pause to make sure she doesn't say something stupid) "...former president" She didn't need to say it. The long pause said everything it needed to. Also, going over to shake his hand was such an alpha move and she knew it. Trump was pretty much rattled from that point onwards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If kamala had called trump a little bitch when talking about how he's still recovering being fired I would have lost it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago "This..." (long pause to make sure she doesn't say something stupid) "...former president" She didn't need to say it. The long pause said everything it needed to. Also, going over to shake his hand was such an alpha move and she knew it. Trump was pretty much rattled from that point onwards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago "This..." (long pause to make sure she doesn't say something stupid) "...former president" She didn't need to say it. The long pause said everything it needed to. Also, going over to shake his hand was such an alpha move and she knew it. Trump was pretty much rattled from that point onwards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago It was such a huge stage tonight and she was beyond solid. Like you said, the best democratic performance since... can't remember. maybe you didn't say now that I think about it. She came off so reasonable and nailed all the points that should do damage to a turd like Trump.(i'm fine with name calling) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world [S] 50 points 2 years ago (1 child) Thinking that same thing. For once just enforce the rules on this man baby permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem is that they would hone in on that and make the debate about that rather than Kamala. They took the L for her Win. It's shitty. But what they had to do to make her the focal point. He absolutely is gaslighting them to make it about what he wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Who is "they" in this context? If you're talking about trumpers, they're a lost cause, man. They're always going to have some alternate version of reality. The only way we're going to move forward as a country is if we stop worrying about what they're going to say or do. We cannot let the tyranny of the minority hold this country hostage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago speakers took the L for Kamala I think is what he means permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem is that they would hone in on that and make the debate about that rather than Kamala. They took the L for her Win. It's shitty. But what they had to do to make her the focal point. He absolutely is gaslighting them to make it about what he wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Who is "they" in this context? If you're talking about trumpers, they're a lost cause, man. They're always going to have some alternate version of reality. The only way we're going to move forward as a country is if we stop worrying about what they're going to say or do. We cannot let the tyranny of the minority hold this country hostage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago speakers took the L for Kamala I think is what he means permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Who is "they" in this context? If you're talking about trumpers, they're a lost cause, man. They're always going to have some alternate version of reality. The only way we're going to move forward as a country is if we stop worrying about what they're going to say or do. We cannot let the tyranny of the minority hold this country hostage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago speakers took the L for Kamala I think is what he means permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago speakers took the L for Kamala I think is what he means permalink fedilink source parent
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) They're afraid to be called unfair after he said that they'd be unfair. It's one of the strategies that us uses to suppress fighting back against his lies and ineptitude. First, your preemptively accuse someone of something. Second you do awful things that would normally rightfully get a response, but the authorities have to be careful otherwise you'll accuse them of doing the thing they should be doing. Third, you get your way even though you broke the rules, or you get to yell about how you knew, just knew! That you'd be treated badly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Fuck it man, just be unfair. He's going to say you were anyways, go scorched earth on the motherfucker. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Fuck it man, just be unfair. He's going to say you were anyways, go scorched earth on the motherfucker. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago This has been a complaint across a dozen debates for 8 years now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago Agree. They are just letting him prove what a crazy duck he is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) That was Harris's request, I thought. In the original terms for the Trump/Biden debate, each person's mic was shut off except when it was their turn to speak. Harris asked for that to be changed to allow interruptions, and Trump went along with it. If that's not working out for Harris, she should probably talk to her own team that wanted it, instead of whining about the moderators. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rob64@startrek.website 29 points 2 years ago (1 child) It worked out just fine for her. Gave him a chance to dig his own grave, which is what he did and what she wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 10 points 2 years ago (3 children) Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. It's disrespectful to talk over women and take up their time. The debate proves Harris's point that Sleepy DonOLD cares only about himself and goes to great lengths to tell more and more lies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. What did Eisenhower have to do with it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny That's literally his strongest selling point, his voters support him because he normalizes misogyny. If he ran over and slapped her to the floor they'd consider it a show of American Strength. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not a new development, dude. Do we really need to rehash the lessons of the last 8 years again? The people who vote for him don't care about your sensibilities. They like that he's rude and think it shows strength. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mic being active or not doesn't affect her hearing. If he interrupts her she'd still hear it, only the TV audience wouldn't, so she'd seem flustered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rob64@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago That's a really great point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rob64@startrek.website 29 points 2 years ago (1 child) It worked out just fine for her. Gave him a chance to dig his own grave, which is what he did and what she wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 10 points 2 years ago (3 children) Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. It's disrespectful to talk over women and take up their time. The debate proves Harris's point that Sleepy DonOLD cares only about himself and goes to great lengths to tell more and more lies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. What did Eisenhower have to do with it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny That's literally his strongest selling point, his voters support him because he normalizes misogyny. If he ran over and slapped her to the floor they'd consider it a show of American Strength. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not a new development, dude. Do we really need to rehash the lessons of the last 8 years again? The people who vote for him don't care about your sensibilities. They like that he's rude and think it shows strength. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bradinutah 10 points 2 years ago (3 children) Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. It's disrespectful to talk over women and take up their time. The debate proves Harris's point that Sleepy DonOLD cares only about himself and goes to great lengths to tell more and more lies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. What did Eisenhower have to do with it? permalink fedilink source parent [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny That's literally his strongest selling point, his voters support him because he normalizes misogyny. If he ran over and slapped her to the floor they'd consider it a show of American Strength. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not a new development, dude. Do we really need to rehash the lessons of the last 8 years again? The people who vote for him don't care about your sensibilities. They like that he's rude and think it shows strength. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny. What did Eisenhower have to do with it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Weird 34 was just showing off his misogyny That's literally his strongest selling point, his voters support him because he normalizes misogyny. If he ran over and slapped her to the floor they'd consider it a show of American Strength. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not a new development, dude. Do we really need to rehash the lessons of the last 8 years again? The people who vote for him don't care about your sensibilities. They like that he's rude and think it shows strength. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bradinutah 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You may have missed the point of the debate, which is to help people on the fence choose a side. Anyone on the fence HAS been asleep the last 8 years and ought to not choose to side with Cult 34 and their rude, misguided values. I expect many a boomer MAGAt has a wet dream of the rapist groping her on stage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) What's up with the 34? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bradinutah 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) DonOLD was convicted of 34 felony counts in New York. He hopes people don't keep his factual criminality on the top of their minds. The purpose and motive of the crime was to deceive voters. It's election fraud. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Thanks for the explanation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) The mic being active or not doesn't affect her hearing. If he interrupts her she'd still hear it, only the TV audience wouldn't, so she'd seem flustered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rob64@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago That's a really great point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rob64@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago That's a really great point. permalink fedilink source parent