you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Pretty sure their recent stock drop has more to do with them releasing a bad game based on a dying IP than on what an exec said months ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't know it's a bad game since I won't buy it because of what an exec said months ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Given how often we see games selling extremely well even after the companies behind them do awful stuff you're in a very small minority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The announcement of the game left an extremely bad impression too, because the game was $60 or $70 but didn't include all the content, there were three other tiers or "editions" you could buy, the last option being the $8 subscription service that had a shiny blue border around it and included all the content.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Isn’t Ubisoft infamously known for this subscription model on all of their products?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The greed goes deep. It's funny that micro transactions hardly ever were micro. If it's was a few cents for a pure cosmetic item I might even do that from time to time, but take the discord cosmetics 50ct I might buy sth blinky, but they want 5-10€ for that shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments