A retired Aurora police sergeant faces criminal charges for raping his daughter and continually sexually assaulting her and his two adopted daughters, but he remains free from custody while his ex-wife is in jail for objecting to court-ordered reunification therapy meant to repair his relationship with two of his sons.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

has nothing to do with my other two arguments.

So your two paragraphs of pontificating have nothing to do with what's in the article?

I guess you're just here to say "I believe judges are always good at their jobs and never make mistakes"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No, I am definitely complaining about the article's portrayal of the therapy.

    You should reread my comment, which specifically said the judge was being derelict in his duty if he wasn't taking a broader context into account.

    I do understand that reading comprehension isn't the strongest point of the internet ragebait-swallowing community. Why you all are so eager is a little beyond me though. Ultimately you should be remembering the profit-driven priorities of media companies, and how their models often revolve around triggering people's emotions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments