you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 186 points 2 years ago (96 children)

On one hand, fuck Musk. On the other hand, internet from space that can't be blocked by governments is a net positive in my book.

  • source
  • hideshow 96 child comments
  • [–] 264 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Don't forget that Musk is also the one who intentionally blocked paid service from Ukraine during a critical moment in the early days of Russia's current genocide, because Musk sucks up to Putin. Dude needs to answer for his actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [+] 116 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Secret cabal of space lizard people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not blockable by any government would be a positive in my book if it didn't imply bloclable by a single billionaire with huge mood swing. Don't forget how musk switched off starlink in Crimea at Putin's request when the Russian realized starlink guided missile were heading towards their ships (Source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    That's not exactly what happened. Starlink was already disabled in Crimea when the attack was launched and Musk refused to enable it specifically for the attack. Then the initial reports got a bit tangled up.

    But yes, none of this should be up to Musk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Controlled by governments or controlled by corpos and the super rich? I say there's hardly an improvement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah, cables or radio waves, it's the same thing in the end.

    What we need (IMO) is another layer on top if the classic internet with encryption and hookers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Can't calculate the net yet, since we don't know the gross. He has the capability to cause massive damage with the power he wields. It's already clear that he's incapable of providing an unbiased platform. It needs to belong to the people or it can never be trusted

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It needs to belong to the people or it can never be trusted

    Damn commies!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The ability to recognize sarcasm doesn't seem to be particularly developed on Lemmy.

    And if fucking hate the /s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    That’s an arbitrary metric. What about internet across oceans, or across forests? Blocking content is a question of why and what. Shouldn’t we be able to block child exploitation websites? That is to say, of course we can, and it’s very easy. The only question is whether you want that kind of censorship to be up to your service provider or your government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)