you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 260 points 2 years ago (22 children)

The weird thing is, they don't actually sell the jars anymore. "Ball jars" are not made by the ball jar corporation after their antitrust lawsuits for being a fucking jar monopoly. So they sold the "ball jar" rights and now only do aluminum cans for food packaging and high end satellites and satellite launch systems.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 178 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    now only do aluminum cans for :

    • food packaging
    • high end satellites
    • satellite launch systems.

    I find this interpretation funny

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Aluminum cylinders only.

    Not aluminum? Not interested. Not a cylinder? Not a chance.

    Squared off glass cylinder? Legally prohibited.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Most advanced cans in the airspace industry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    They don't even do aerospace anymore. Ball Aerospace & Technologies was bought by BAE Systems earlier this year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    On December 11, 1939, the U.S. Government sued the Ball Brothers, the Hazel-Atlas Glass Co., and the Owens-Illinois Glass Co. under monopoly charges based on the Hartford-Empire and Owens licensing agreements. The plaintiff claimed that small producers were being frozen out of business or prohibited from entering manufacture by the nature of the licenses. Almost a decade later, in 1947, the justices rendered a final verdict. The court prohibited the Ball Brothers from purchasing or otherwise controlling any other businesses engaged in the same manufacturing processes – in other words, the small jar producers. In addition, Ball had to divest itself of the Three Rivers Glass Co. (already closed for almost a decade) that Ball had acquired in 1936. Ball sold the property

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    why is the government beefing with mason jar companies and not multi-billionaires

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    So, at the time (1930) ball jar actually would have qualified as big business in the sense that you mean.
    Home canning was very popular and they consistently bought out smaller companies.
    Since they were privately owned, it's tricky to find specifics about value, but they were "found a university", "own a company town or two", "chairman of the federal reserve" levels of rich.

    So actually a pretty good use of government.

  • source
  • parent