this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

12 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

If Neuralink can prove its device is safe in humans, it would still potentially take more than a decade for the start-up to secure commercial use approval

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is gonna end up terrible, why the hell would you want chip in your brain?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

In capitalism, there is no doubt this will be used to compel labor. Imagine if your boss or some authority could inflict severe pain that causes no physical damage until you comply? Hello neo-slavery!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds dystopian, this sounds like an episode straight out of Black mirror why the hell would anybody want to support this?(or is there nobody aside from elon supporting it?)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

This sounds like something that everyone else is going to not comment on until they see how it turns out. Not to mention that it is way too early to even test on humans cause the monkey trails ended badly. Though I’m sure the Musk fanboys will line up as fast as possible.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)