you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So you're saying if the Russians struck Manhattan it would be relatively little impact. You think of the ten thousand nukes the US and Russia have on average will kill less than a hundred people. Or if just Russia, less than two hundred people per.

I think each nuke is tens of thousands of immediate deaths followed by hundreds of thousands of mid to long term radiation fatalities. If we pretend that 25% of their 5000 or so nukes works, that's still 1250 nukes. If each nuke of that 1250 works and kills 100,000 each, that's 125 million people. I don't think this is so far fetched given that a little over 80% of Americans live in urban areas.

I just don't know how a society can recover if the majority of it's urban centers gets nuked and there is residual radiation there for the foreseeable future. Japan recovered because the nukes were small and there was only two sites, and that still caused about 110,000 casualties.

How many submarines do you think they have in the Atlantic and Pacific with nuclear strike capabilities? How many nukes do you think are in range of major north american cities?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Most nukes are targeted at the other side's nukes. Those aren't in population centers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Uh, my state would like a word about that....

    https://www.kuow.org/stories/the-secret-history-of-nukes-in-washington-state

    Puget Sound is home to around one-third of the nation’s active nukes.

    For those unaware, Puget Sound contains the largest cities in Washington as well as many dense suburbs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment