you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Microsoft published, using their software and servers, a libelous claim, to potentially millions of people.
The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant.

    Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.

    Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it's used, usually.

    Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.

  • source
  • parent