so, the heart of your argument itself is sexist. Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he's a man. Athletes at this level are insanely talented and fit. Some are even genetic anomalies, which explain why they can be so good at their sport. Simone biles is really small, which is why she's so good at flipping.

A female boxer at this level would decimate a male boxer who isn't genetically selected for and who hasn't trained his whole life to get to that level. Being male doesn't make one good at sports.

On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there's no money involved for the winner, requiring several hundred people to be the athletes who might be good enough to go to the event, boatloads of money to train them, and even then, they might get one through the event if the athlete isn't injured. All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

What do you think they would achieve in any practical way by winning a bunch of gold medals?

It's the Olympics, not trade negotiations.

What the the absolute fuck are you talking about? This is some deranged paranoid nonsense.

You realize that she's a cis woman, right? Right?

Or did you take the word from people on YouTube who talk about everything in a certain way?

They have a specific rule: if your birth certificate and passport say you're a woman, you get to compete as one.

What rule do you think they should be using?