this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

966 readers
49 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Fair, but I still think they should switch. I don't think it would be too difficult anyway. It should mostly amount to rewrite of the decoder as can be inferred from the fact that it is mostly a superset of MIPS64.

The perceived benefits, are being independent of the west on technology. Which RISC-V already provides.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are chinese companies making RISC-V chips and machines: https://milkv.io/pioneer

I get the impression that LoongArch has more priority because they fully own that ISA which means foreign entities such as the US Empire can have 0 impact on it. If something happens to RISC-V that could put China at a disadvantage they still have LoongArch. If they go all in on RISC-V they could easily get fucked or bullied into submission, that's my view anyways.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's no danger in using RISC-V -- if the official standard is compromised somehow, China can just make their own "fork". I think it's more likely just a business decision by Loongson. Unless it's replaced, it'll likely become an open standard eventually

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Good point, I didn't think of that! Either way, I'm quite happy to see more general purpose RISCs emerge. At this point I'm just really sick of dealing with Intel's CISC crap lol.

load more comments (1 replies)