▲ 371 ▼ Conversing with Mathematicians (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 185 points 2 years ago* (17 children) What about plain old x = -10? -10 ^ 2 = 100 -10 ^ 3 = -1000 -10 ^ 5 = -100000 permalink fedilink source hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] Redacted@lemmy.world 122 points 2 years ago Isn't that the joke? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's what he wrote, I imagine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Siethron@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is, but with imaginary numbets permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) numbet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago numberwang permalink fedilink source parent [–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 47 points 2 years ago i² = -1 so... permalink fedilink source parent [–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 32 points 2 years ago (2 children) 10 * i^2 is -10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) of course, but this problem is solvable without any understanding of complex numbers, and 10*i^2 is a really clunky, multi-operation expression whereas -10 is just an integer. simplifying one's answers is standard practice and any grader who received the answer in the OP would be obligated to point out that while technically correct, they're missing the basic fact that the answer is -10. The Rube Goldberg comment is apt as the solution is absurdly complicated and overengineered for the task it performs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the thing you are looking at is built upon. permalink fedilink source parent [–] thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Nothing gets past you eh? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago (1 child) people being pedantic showoffs doesn't really register as humor for me, TBH permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago That's true, the OOP is being quite snarky with their comment on a post where someone's had a genuine basic doubt permalink fedilink source parent [–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah exactly you're right, why overcomplicate the problem like the Reddit comment did? I guess that's just typical Reddit thinking that being pendantic and using lots of fancy words and long explanations makes you smart. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nah just boiler plate autism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago no permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago That was my immediate thought too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago Boooooring permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 122 points 2 years ago Isn't that the joke? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 years ago (3 children) That's what he wrote, I imagine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Siethron@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is, but with imaginary numbets permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) numbet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago numberwang permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children) It is, but with imaginary numbets permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) numbet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago numberwang permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) numbet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago numberwang permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 32 points 2 years ago (2 children) 10 * i^2 is -10. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) of course, but this problem is solvable without any understanding of complex numbers, and 10*i^2 is a really clunky, multi-operation expression whereas -10 is just an integer. simplifying one's answers is standard practice and any grader who received the answer in the OP would be obligated to point out that while technically correct, they're missing the basic fact that the answer is -10. The Rube Goldberg comment is apt as the solution is absurdly complicated and overengineered for the task it performs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the thing you are looking at is built upon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) of course, but this problem is solvable without any understanding of complex numbers, and 10*i^2 is a really clunky, multi-operation expression whereas -10 is just an integer. simplifying one's answers is standard practice and any grader who received the answer in the OP would be obligated to point out that while technically correct, they're missing the basic fact that the answer is -10. The Rube Goldberg comment is apt as the solution is absurdly complicated and overengineered for the task it performs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the thing you are looking at is built upon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago Yes that's what the thing you are looking at is built upon. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago (2 children) Nothing gets past you eh? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago (1 child) people being pedantic showoffs doesn't really register as humor for me, TBH permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago That's true, the OOP is being quite snarky with their comment on a post where someone's had a genuine basic doubt permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago (1 child) people being pedantic showoffs doesn't really register as humor for me, TBH permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago That's true, the OOP is being quite snarky with their comment on a post where someone's had a genuine basic doubt permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago That's true, the OOP is being quite snarky with their comment on a post where someone's had a genuine basic doubt permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Yeah exactly you're right, why overcomplicate the problem like the Reddit comment did? I guess that's just typical Reddit thinking that being pendantic and using lots of fancy words and long explanations makes you smart. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nah just boiler plate autism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago no permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Nah just boiler plate autism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago no permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago That was my immediate thought too. permalink fedilink source parent