you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Yes, a flying object that isn't conclusively identifiable is common, unless you put work into identifying it. This isn't a huge story.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 years ago

    Absolutely, but the hearing was never about presenting evidence of extraterrestrials. It is about creating a safe and transparent process for reporting unidentified flying objects. A system for collecting data on such incidents is something worthwhile for many reasons. Then and only then could we have an actual discussion on anything further regarding the potential of extraterrestrials if credible evidence exists. Too much bs until then

  • source
  • parent