we appear to be the first to write up the outrage coherently too. much thanks to the illustrious @self

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 2 years ago (21 children)

I'm too old to discuss against bad faith arguments.

Especially with people who won't read the information I provide them showing their initial information was wrong.

One is a company that has something to sell, the other an article with citations showing why it's not easy to determine what percentage of a data set is infringing on copyright, or whether exact reproduction via "fishing expedition" prompting is a useful metric to determine if unauthorized copyright was used in training.

The dumbest take though is attacking Mistral of all LLMs, even though it's on an Apache 2.0 license.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

    I've read the article you've posted: it does not refute the fucking datapoint provided, it literally DOES NOT EVEN MENTION MISTRAL AT ALL.

    so all I can tell you is to take your pearlclutching tantrum bullshit and please fuck off already

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    god these weird little fuckers’ ability to fill a thread with garbage is fucking notable isn’t it? something about loving LLMs makes you act like an LLM. how depressing for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago
    • high willingness to accept painfully inexact responses
    • high tendency to side with authority when given no information
    • low ability to distinguish "how it is" from "how it seems like it should be"

    Meta:

    • default expectation that others are the same way
    • indignant consent-ignoring gesture if they're not
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    To think that when sneer club/techtakes migrated to lemmy, I was pretty sure we would not be getting a lot of incidental traffic to the communities. Just about as wrong as you can be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    previously we were r/SneerClub and r/TechTakes on Reddit. we’ve also got a local archive of old r/SneerClub posts which I’m currently redesigning to fix the, ah, everything about its web design

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)
  • [+] -4 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    "exact percentage"

    just fuck right off. wasting my fucken time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You're the one who linked to an exact percentage, not me. Have a good day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    re-read your chatgpt response and think about whether the percentages in my original link could be too high or too low.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments