you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 106 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Don't worry the other apps are still full of them, and my boss still uses them for every department meeting.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    In my company's presentation template, they have an AI-generated image of the inside of a cathedral, with one of our products placed on the ground and then a component of that product in much larger size is floating in the air. And then there's a woman in spiritual clothing looking up to that component, like it's some sort of god.

    I do have many questions, but the main one is: What the fuck?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    NGL that sounds pretty hilarious, I'd like to see that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Thirded

    EDIT: I don't know the Lemmy rules actually - maybe seconding a motion is enough to set it into action

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The second normally brings it to a vote. So … all those in favor?

    … Aye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That's pretty fuckin funny man, are you sure the art boys aren't self aware?

    Gotta ask, does it look like your product/ the component were part of the prompt, or were they added in post?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It was added in post, I'm pretty sure. The product itself, it might've been able to generate, but wouldn't have nailed all the details. And the component, there's just no way it would have enough training data, nor would training data contain the name of that component.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments