▲ 241 ▼ I don't think he leads by example (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 2 years ago by hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) The OT god and NT god are literally different gods. CMV. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago The OT god is firmly monolatristic, other gods canonically exist. The NT god is after Judaism transitioned to monotheism, so god had to change from less "my dad will beat up your dad" to more "god is responsible for everything so he's omnibenevolent but don't think about it too hard." permalink fedilink source parent [–] hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Depictions of YHWH are inconsistent from book to book in OT, and even within one book you sometimes get different pictures. You have to remember that these texts were composed over hundreds of years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago The scriptures are not univocal, not inerrant, not divinely inspired. These remain the academic consensus and what is taught in seminary, which is to say ministers deliberately lie to the laity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago The OT god is firmly monolatristic, other gods canonically exist. The NT god is after Judaism transitioned to monotheism, so god had to change from less "my dad will beat up your dad" to more "god is responsible for everything so he's omnibenevolent but don't think about it too hard." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Depictions of YHWH are inconsistent from book to book in OT, and even within one book you sometimes get different pictures. You have to remember that these texts were composed over hundreds of years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago The scriptures are not univocal, not inerrant, not divinely inspired. These remain the academic consensus and what is taught in seminary, which is to say ministers deliberately lie to the laity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago The scriptures are not univocal, not inerrant, not divinely inspired. These remain the academic consensus and what is taught in seminary, which is to say ministers deliberately lie to the laity. permalink fedilink source parent