this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

News

7 readers
5 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

Kennedy, an anti-vaccine crusader, is seeking support for a Democratic presidential run.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Regardless of your opinion of RFK Jr, censorship has no place in a free society. I'm not comfortable with Google and other megacorps being the arbiters of truth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So to the classics...

Yelling "fire!!!" in a crowded theater or "bomb!"/"gun!" At a crowded concert where people can be trampled to death or vigilantes carrying can start getting trigger happy with any "suspicious" behavior is cool with you? Those folks should see consequences.

This action from YouTube is consequence after the fact, same as those situations. It should be regulated carefully, but there is a line where you are actively putting lives at risk. We agree to uphold that subjective standard collectively - that's what a society is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yelling fire in a theater isn't actually illegal, contrary to common belief. It's a flawed paraphrasing of a 1969 Supreme Court ruling, Brandenburg v. Ohio, which held that speech which would be likely to incite imminent lawless action, such as a riot, is not protected under the First Amendment. Now if someone was injured due to a stampede they could and should be held liable, but the speech itself is not illegal.

To your second example, if some idiot started shooting because someone yelled "gun" or "bomb" they would be charged with murder / manslaughter, or at the very least reckless use of a firearm, and lose their right to carry.

I'm not opposed to removing videos that advocate violence, but I don't think this video falls under that category.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Your interpretation is incorrect as it my earlier link, there are clear local jurisdiction examples of laws that have been passed over the last 100 years to prevent this type of harmful speech. What is the purpose of government but to protect citizens from harm? There is no reasonable debate amongst any credible physician or scientist with an ounce of statistical knowledge that vaccines cause autism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)