▲ 973 ▼ Las Vegas' dystopia-sphere, powered by 150 Nvidia GPUs and drawing up to 28,000,000 watts, is both a testament to the hubris of humanity and an admittedly impressive technical feat | PC Gamer (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 2 years ago by filister@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 438 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 307 points 2 years ago (218 children) The power of 21000 homes for advertising. What's most impressive is that it is even legal. permalink fedilink source hideshow 218 child comments replies: [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 106 points 2 years ago (7 children) Or profitable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (6 children) Is it? Last I‘ve heard it was bleeding money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago Makes sense. Gimmicks are gimmicks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Probably because they're not doing much with it. It's $100/person to see the basic "Planet Earth" showing and almost $200 to see The Grateful Dead show. Previously they showed a Phish show. That's it for options, and none of it sounds really appealing to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) [–] blakemiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This way some faulty internet lore. The money losses were from a fluke of timing the opening date of operations versus when quarterly finances were reported. Big startup costs meant the first numbers looked silly until they had enough events to get steady profits. They’re doing fine now. Internet should’ve known better too. It’s hard to lose in Vegas and the investors obviously knew what they were doing. The power costs are shocking for sure though. Yikes! permalink fedilink source parent [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 years ago (205 children) I love this kind of shit. Building things for the sake of it is worth it. Not only as just expression, which may be hubris but it's still expression. Also entertainment, inspiration, pushing the art of engineering, and just giving people something to do, and all the good that comes with that like personal and trade growth. A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 205 child comments replies: [–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago (15 children) We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (11 children) The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] dandi8@fedia.io 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about using it for the free school lunches that the Governor decided to veto for some fucking reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago We would rather have the children starve to death than being called a communist. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago Is that where guillotines come in? permalink fedilink source parent [–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago Maybe it would’ve if governments taxed them properly and spent that money to save the planet permalink fedilink source parent [–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doesn’t flint still not have clean water? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (2 replies) [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago This is the equivalent of saying “Eat all your dinner cause there’s starving children in Africa”. Sure, this sounds nice, but this logic falls apart the instant you start thinking about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CybranM@feddit.nu 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You sound like the people criticising NASA for spending money on science. "Who do X when Y is still an issue?" I doubt you make that kind of prioritization with your own money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago (180 children) A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live. Well, that hubris won't afford you a livable world for much longer. We could have respected the planet that birthed us, and taken only what we needed. Instead we extracted every natural resource we could find, and left behind countless shattered ecosystems. Even as the walls close in, we accelerate our pettiness and perform acts of wastefulness that alone do measurable ecological damage, and we celebrate it because it is "cool". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 180 child comments replies: [–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (179 children) If this is something you feel strongly about, then please stop eating factory farmed meat and animal products if you havent already. It is something you personally can actually do. It helps, and it will genuinely make you feel better. You may not have much power, but using the power you do have to help the team you claim to be on instead of the other team is a massive step forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 179 child comments replies: [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (28 children) Look, you're not really wrong, but you get that this shit is why people get irritated with vegans right? We were talking about being wasteful with energy resources for the sake of capitalism and you came in with a lazy segue to animal rights and nutritional health. It's a conversation that we should be having, but it's also insufferable to constantly be shoehorning it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 28 child comments replies: [–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children) I don't agree. The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about veganism, animal rights or your health, it's just about sanity. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe. As long as >95% of the global population still consumes meat I understand the urge to bring this topic everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments load more comments (24 replies) [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful. permalink fedilink source parent [+] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (150 replies) [–] rasensprenger@feddit.org 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) I understand that perspective, but does it really have to be advertising? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago I'd prefer if it weren't. Though that's not the only use for this thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) This isn't pushing any boundaries, though. This is off the shelf technology. Anybody can do something big by throwing a shit ton of money at it. It would be pushing boundaries of tech or art if it was for instance super power efficient, or mind bending in any way. This is a fucking sphere, it's the simplest shape and a rip off of the pyramids but less original and not even comparable in terms of durability. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It is absolutely pushing boundaries to be driving this many pixels at a frame rate that doesn't take minutes to refresh. I build a lot of projects with addressable LEDs and the typical hobbyist stuff chokes out when you start trying to control more than a thousand or so. This thing has 256 million pixels inside and 1.2 million outside. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure but we’re burning tons of coal to have this thing advertise minion movies, not anything artistic or worthwhile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 106 points 2 years ago (7 children) Or profitable permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (6 children) Is it? Last I‘ve heard it was bleeding money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago Makes sense. Gimmicks are gimmicks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Probably because they're not doing much with it. It's $100/person to see the basic "Planet Earth" showing and almost $200 to see The Grateful Dead show. Previously they showed a Phish show. That's it for options, and none of it sounds really appealing to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) [–] blakemiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This way some faulty internet lore. The money losses were from a fluke of timing the opening date of operations versus when quarterly finances were reported. Big startup costs meant the first numbers looked silly until they had enough events to get steady profits. They’re doing fine now. Internet should’ve known better too. It’s hard to lose in Vegas and the investors obviously knew what they were doing. The power costs are shocking for sure though. Yikes! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (6 children) Is it? Last I‘ve heard it was bleeding money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago Makes sense. Gimmicks are gimmicks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Probably because they're not doing much with it. It's $100/person to see the basic "Planet Earth" showing and almost $200 to see The Grateful Dead show. Previously they showed a Phish show. That's it for options, and none of it sounds really appealing to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) [–] blakemiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This way some faulty internet lore. The money losses were from a fluke of timing the opening date of operations versus when quarterly finances were reported. Big startup costs meant the first numbers looked silly until they had enough events to get steady profits. They’re doing fine now. Internet should’ve known better too. It’s hard to lose in Vegas and the investors obviously knew what they were doing. The power costs are shocking for sure though. Yikes! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago Makes sense. Gimmicks are gimmicks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) Probably because they're not doing much with it. It's $100/person to see the basic "Planet Earth" showing and almost $200 to see The Grateful Dead show. Previously they showed a Phish show. That's it for options, and none of it sounds really appealing to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blakemiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago This way some faulty internet lore. The money losses were from a fluke of timing the opening date of operations versus when quarterly finances were reported. Big startup costs meant the first numbers looked silly until they had enough events to get steady profits. They’re doing fine now. Internet should’ve known better too. It’s hard to lose in Vegas and the investors obviously knew what they were doing. The power costs are shocking for sure though. Yikes! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 years ago (205 children) I love this kind of shit. Building things for the sake of it is worth it. Not only as just expression, which may be hubris but it's still expression. Also entertainment, inspiration, pushing the art of engineering, and just giving people something to do, and all the good that comes with that like personal and trade growth. A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 205 child comments replies: [–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago (15 children) We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (11 children) The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] dandi8@fedia.io 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about using it for the free school lunches that the Governor decided to veto for some fucking reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago We would rather have the children starve to death than being called a communist. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago Is that where guillotines come in? permalink fedilink source parent [–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago Maybe it would’ve if governments taxed them properly and spent that money to save the planet permalink fedilink source parent [–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doesn’t flint still not have clean water? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (2 replies) [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago This is the equivalent of saying “Eat all your dinner cause there’s starving children in Africa”. Sure, this sounds nice, but this logic falls apart the instant you start thinking about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CybranM@feddit.nu 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You sound like the people criticising NASA for spending money on science. "Who do X when Y is still an issue?" I doubt you make that kind of prioritization with your own money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago (180 children) A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live. Well, that hubris won't afford you a livable world for much longer. We could have respected the planet that birthed us, and taken only what we needed. Instead we extracted every natural resource we could find, and left behind countless shattered ecosystems. Even as the walls close in, we accelerate our pettiness and perform acts of wastefulness that alone do measurable ecological damage, and we celebrate it because it is "cool". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 180 child comments replies: [–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (179 children) If this is something you feel strongly about, then please stop eating factory farmed meat and animal products if you havent already. It is something you personally can actually do. It helps, and it will genuinely make you feel better. You may not have much power, but using the power you do have to help the team you claim to be on instead of the other team is a massive step forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 179 child comments replies: [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (28 children) Look, you're not really wrong, but you get that this shit is why people get irritated with vegans right? We were talking about being wasteful with energy resources for the sake of capitalism and you came in with a lazy segue to animal rights and nutritional health. It's a conversation that we should be having, but it's also insufferable to constantly be shoehorning it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 28 child comments replies: [–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children) I don't agree. The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about veganism, animal rights or your health, it's just about sanity. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe. As long as >95% of the global population still consumes meat I understand the urge to bring this topic everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments load more comments (24 replies) [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful. permalink fedilink source parent [+] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (150 replies) [–] rasensprenger@feddit.org 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) I understand that perspective, but does it really have to be advertising? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago I'd prefer if it weren't. Though that's not the only use for this thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) This isn't pushing any boundaries, though. This is off the shelf technology. Anybody can do something big by throwing a shit ton of money at it. It would be pushing boundaries of tech or art if it was for instance super power efficient, or mind bending in any way. This is a fucking sphere, it's the simplest shape and a rip off of the pyramids but less original and not even comparable in terms of durability. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It is absolutely pushing boundaries to be driving this many pixels at a frame rate that doesn't take minutes to refresh. I build a lot of projects with addressable LEDs and the typical hobbyist stuff chokes out when you start trying to control more than a thousand or so. This thing has 256 million pixels inside and 1.2 million outside. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure but we’re burning tons of coal to have this thing advertise minion movies, not anything artistic or worthwhile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago (15 children) We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (11 children) The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] dandi8@fedia.io 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about using it for the free school lunches that the Governor decided to veto for some fucking reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago We would rather have the children starve to death than being called a communist. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago Is that where guillotines come in? permalink fedilink source parent [–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago Maybe it would’ve if governments taxed them properly and spent that money to save the planet permalink fedilink source parent [–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doesn’t flint still not have clean water? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (2 replies) [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago This is the equivalent of saying “Eat all your dinner cause there’s starving children in Africa”. Sure, this sounds nice, but this logic falls apart the instant you start thinking about it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CybranM@feddit.nu 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You sound like the people criticising NASA for spending money on science. "Who do X when Y is still an issue?" I doubt you make that kind of prioritization with your own money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (11 children) The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] dandi8@fedia.io 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about using it for the free school lunches that the Governor decided to veto for some fucking reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago We would rather have the children starve to death than being called a communist. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago Is that where guillotines come in? permalink fedilink source parent [–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago Maybe it would’ve if governments taxed them properly and spent that money to save the planet permalink fedilink source parent [–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doesn’t flint still not have clean water? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dandi8@fedia.io 35 points 2 years ago (1 child) Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about using it for the free school lunches that the Governor decided to veto for some fucking reason? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago We would rather have the children starve to death than being called a communist. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago We would rather have the children starve to death than being called a communist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago Is that where guillotines come in? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago Maybe it would’ve if governments taxed them properly and spent that money to save the planet permalink fedilink source parent
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doesn’t flint still not have clean water? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago This is the equivalent of saying “Eat all your dinner cause there’s starving children in Africa”. Sure, this sounds nice, but this logic falls apart the instant you start thinking about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You sound like the people criticising NASA for spending money on science. "Who do X when Y is still an issue?" I doubt you make that kind of prioritization with your own money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago (180 children) A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live. Well, that hubris won't afford you a livable world for much longer. We could have respected the planet that birthed us, and taken only what we needed. Instead we extracted every natural resource we could find, and left behind countless shattered ecosystems. Even as the walls close in, we accelerate our pettiness and perform acts of wastefulness that alone do measurable ecological damage, and we celebrate it because it is "cool". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 180 child comments replies: [–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (179 children) If this is something you feel strongly about, then please stop eating factory farmed meat and animal products if you havent already. It is something you personally can actually do. It helps, and it will genuinely make you feel better. You may not have much power, but using the power you do have to help the team you claim to be on instead of the other team is a massive step forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 179 child comments replies: [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (28 children) Look, you're not really wrong, but you get that this shit is why people get irritated with vegans right? We were talking about being wasteful with energy resources for the sake of capitalism and you came in with a lazy segue to animal rights and nutritional health. It's a conversation that we should be having, but it's also insufferable to constantly be shoehorning it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 28 child comments replies: [–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children) I don't agree. The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about veganism, animal rights or your health, it's just about sanity. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe. As long as >95% of the global population still consumes meat I understand the urge to bring this topic everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments load more comments (24 replies) [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful. permalink fedilink source parent [+] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (150 replies)
[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (179 children) If this is something you feel strongly about, then please stop eating factory farmed meat and animal products if you havent already. It is something you personally can actually do. It helps, and it will genuinely make you feel better. You may not have much power, but using the power you do have to help the team you claim to be on instead of the other team is a massive step forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 179 child comments replies: [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (28 children) Look, you're not really wrong, but you get that this shit is why people get irritated with vegans right? We were talking about being wasteful with energy resources for the sake of capitalism and you came in with a lazy segue to animal rights and nutritional health. It's a conversation that we should be having, but it's also insufferable to constantly be shoehorning it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 28 child comments replies: [–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children) I don't agree. The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about veganism, animal rights or your health, it's just about sanity. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe. As long as >95% of the global population still consumes meat I understand the urge to bring this topic everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments load more comments (24 replies) [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful. permalink fedilink source parent [+] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (150 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (28 children) Look, you're not really wrong, but you get that this shit is why people get irritated with vegans right? We were talking about being wasteful with energy resources for the sake of capitalism and you came in with a lazy segue to animal rights and nutritional health. It's a conversation that we should be having, but it's also insufferable to constantly be shoehorning it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 28 child comments replies: [–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children) I don't agree. The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about veganism, animal rights or your health, it's just about sanity. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe. As long as >95% of the global population still consumes meat I understand the urge to bring this topic everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments load more comments (24 replies) [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful. permalink fedilink source parent [+] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (24 children) I don't agree. The comment points out the single most effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about veganism, animal rights or your health, it's just about sanity. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe. As long as >95% of the global population still consumes meat I understand the urge to bring this topic everywhere. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 24 child comments load more comments (24 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rasensprenger@feddit.org 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) I understand that perspective, but does it really have to be advertising? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago I'd prefer if it weren't. Though that's not the only use for this thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago I'd prefer if it weren't. Though that's not the only use for this thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) This isn't pushing any boundaries, though. This is off the shelf technology. Anybody can do something big by throwing a shit ton of money at it. It would be pushing boundaries of tech or art if it was for instance super power efficient, or mind bending in any way. This is a fucking sphere, it's the simplest shape and a rip off of the pyramids but less original and not even comparable in terms of durability. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It is absolutely pushing boundaries to be driving this many pixels at a frame rate that doesn't take minutes to refresh. I build a lot of projects with addressable LEDs and the typical hobbyist stuff chokes out when you start trying to control more than a thousand or so. This thing has 256 million pixels inside and 1.2 million outside. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It is absolutely pushing boundaries to be driving this many pixels at a frame rate that doesn't take minutes to refresh. I build a lot of projects with addressable LEDs and the typical hobbyist stuff chokes out when you start trying to control more than a thousand or so. This thing has 256 million pixels inside and 1.2 million outside. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago They did mention that they are working on making 70% of this powered by solar panels. Maybe this will push forward solar technology in some way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sure but we’re burning tons of coal to have this thing advertise minion movies, not anything artistic or worthwhile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)