you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 84 points 2 years ago (15 children)

We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    This is the equivalent of saying “Eat all your dinner cause there’s starving children in Africa”.

    Sure, this sounds nice, but this logic falls apart the instant you start thinking about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You sound like the people criticising NASA for spending money on science. "Who do X when Y is still an issue?"

    I doubt you make that kind of prioritization with your own money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment