It should be at the fact that they aren’t setting fire to everything, murdering politicians, billionaires, and their lackeys, and generally grinding everything to a halt.

Do you really think this would improve things?

I won't deny that there are a lot of very serious problems and that progress is far slower than it ought to be. I also don't think that wanton murder and anarchy tend to actually improve things very much - ask the victims of the Holodomor if the Russian Revolution improved life for them. Things can always be much worse. That doesn't mean we have to accept the status quo, to be clear, but it is important to maintain a bit of perspective. "Grinding everything to a halt" also includes such useful things as food supply chains and having any job at all. Is it really that much of a surprise that most people wouldn't be super eager to throw away everything they have and plunge the country (and by extension, world) into chaos just in a vague hope that the end result will be better? That's not a small ask.