you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

No, I just think you're being disingenuous so I have no interest in whatever name by name critique you're going to give for a list you already know 80%+ of the names for but are pretending doesn't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I don't think a single person on your theoretical list is electable, if that's what you mean. But I would need you to be specific about who you think might be a viable alternative in order to have any useful discussion about them. I have no need to be disingenuous. You need to actually support your point of view with more than vague suggestions and hand-waving.

  • source
  • parent