you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

Youre missing the point. Whether or not that was actually the intention is completely irrelevant in the modern day, because only fascist assholes actually want to go back

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    But how does Federalism line up with fascism? What the other user is talking about in the original setup where if you don't like the State you live in being stuck in the 1800's, you can leave if you want, the Federal Government guarantees your safe passage to a State living in modern times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You understand these people arent going to stop at federalism, yes? Please take a look at Project 2025. They want to force their own values onto the majority at the federal level, and our ancient electoral system will enable them to do so. And even if they did, that would still be condemning the populations of their own states to repression

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    That is true, I hadn't considered that. Project 2025 does indeed call for curtailing the sovereignty of the individual States. Perhaps not explicitly, but they will leverage the Supremacy Clause as well as the Commerce Clause to usurp the powers of States they don't like.

    Which wouldn't be very "muh states rights" of them, but they don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Precisely. The "Originalism" of the court- backward as it would be- isnt even that. Its a front to sell out federal policy to the highest bidder. Because its not enough to live in Gilead, they have to fuse it with Night City too.

  • source
  • parent