Why would it be bad to terminate investigations that are unlawful or contrary to national interests?
Because "contarary to national interests" means "any investigation that targets friends of mine"
That could be how you would mean it, but that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it.
If you believe that, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
You guys literally just claim things without any evidence... You guys have lost to plot
"You guys literally just claim things without any evidence"
How ironic...
You, just a few comments ago:
"that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it"
If you're so sure of their intent then where is your evidence?
You're doing the exact same thing you accused the other commenter of; you literally just claimed something without any evidence.
Yes because I know what they mean because I have heard them explain the problem. You guys on the other hand dont know what they believe because you dont know anything about them.
Why would it be bad to terminate investigations that are unlawful or contrary to national interests?
Because "contarary to national interests" means "any investigation that targets friends of mine"
That could be how you would mean it, but that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it.
If you believe that, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
You guys literally just claim things without any evidence... You guys have lost to plot
How ironic...
You, just a few comments ago:
If you're so sure of their intent then where is your evidence?
You're doing the exact same thing you accused the other commenter of; you literally just claimed something without any evidence.
Yes because I know what they mean because I have heard them explain the problem. You guys on the other hand dont know what they believe because you dont know anything about them.