this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
706 points (97.3% liked)

Asklemmy

44149 readers
1774 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 127 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Extreme/insane positions on everything. Not just one or two insane positions, not just political extremism; when I say everything I mean EVERYTHING. No nuance allowed. And it has to be fully sincere, otherwise you are dealing with a Jreg.

There are milder versions of this, but I have rarely met a child that didn't have a strongly held insane belief formed from their limited experiences. My favorite was a kid who told me that eating pasta supports fascism because it comes from Italy, so loving Italian products means you support Mussolini. Pizza is fine, though, because that's American.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

jreg is pretty based i think. His content is satire, for sure. A lot of his recent stuff has been delving into more philosophical shit though.

Dude literally doxxed himself and asked people to kill him (in lore)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I was a big fan of jreg pre-2020, but after giving up mainstream social media I currently believe that only cowards, frauds, and master satirists feel the need to use irony. It's arrogant to think you are the third, and I dont think Jreg is either. I think he is a coward.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

ah, i think you should catch up a little bit on jreg then. He's had a similar story arc lmao.

He's "unironically Jregular now"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He's actually leftist I think, and was parodying centrists too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If I remember his coming out video, he's a Democratic Socialist. Which, if the political compass made sense, would be just right of center. But I guess thinking people deserve rights is inherently left-wing to Americans lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

You mean We Have America At Home?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

jreg is a youtube who (ironically?) claims to be anti-centrist, meaning taking an extreme stance on everything, regardless of which extreme.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

jreg is a youtube

Found the adult

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Uuuuuugh. I remember being so black and white, there wasn't any middle ground on anything. It was exhausting.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm just glad I decided to go full moral relativism right away back then. It was a good way to speedrun maturity, although I did maintain some kooky beliefs into early adulthood such as

  • "if you are not multilingual you can't be a good person, and the more languages you speak the better of a person you are"
  • "The Democratic party is a puppet of the Republican party, and in reality the U.S. is only pretending to be a two-party state"
  • "The age of consent should be 25."
  • "Evil people can be good functioning members of society, so we shouldn't discriminate against people who hold evil beliefs as long as they are nice to others."

It was exhausting. Opposite reason from you, there was only middle ground, no black and white allowed. But it came from the same mental place. Pride, arrogance, nievetΓ©.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The Democratic party is a puppet of the Republican party, and in reality the U.S. is only pretending to be a two-party state”

Ah, I see what you mean, anyone who disagrees with you is a child. America is a one party state, just in typical american extravagance they have two of them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Glad we grew out of it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

to go full moral relativism right away

Jesus, so you still think the mature stance was "maybe Hitler wasn't morally wrong"? Bad news, you still have a lot of maturing to do. Like a fucking phenomenal amount. Just because your beliefs as a child were even more baseless doesn't mean you've moved to a sensible position.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thats not what I meant, but I can see why you read what I wrote that way. I personally think "There is no such thing as Truth" was a better place to mature away from than "I've been on this earth for 12 whole years, so I'm grown enough to know what the truth is". I also think you missed the part where I don't believe any of the moral relativism stuff anymore. My young adulthood was nearly 10 years ago, even the clooge I listed at the bottom is loooong gone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, I see what you mean, the way you wrote it made it seem like you considered the process of becoming a moral relativist to be speed running maturity. Well done for growing out of it, then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

See, this right here is why I love you folks on Hexbear. Every good-faith argument can end as a good-faith argument instead of devolving into screeching. That's pretty rare on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you're going to lecture about "maturing", then maybe don't start by jumping to conclusions based on the first sentence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Actually I jumped to conclusions based on the whole comment, as it makes them seem like they consider becoming a moral relativist to be speeding through maturity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Quite the personality analysis from a five sentence comment.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Ha ha that's hilarious πŸ˜‚ such a cherry pick too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

yeah pretty much this. Dealing with one right now, people are funny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This. This is how I pick out if I'm arguing with an adult or not